My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1019.000 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 1019.000 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2020 12:51:04 PM
Creation date
7/24/2020 1:39:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
1019
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2020-08-19 2018-2020
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2020-09-02 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Council
AGE PC 2020/08/04 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 182 Draft 01 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2018-2020
REP PC 051 2020/08/04 2018-2020
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I■1 CIVIL ENGINEERS • SLJRVFYORS <br />Ms. Fumiyo Okuda <br />Kona Country Club, Inc. <br />Trip Generation <br />January 02, 2020 <br />A review of the trip rates published by ITE in Trip Generation, 10th Edition, indicates that <br />the Project is most closely represented by Land Use Code 260 — Recreational Homes. <br />ITE defines this land use as: <br />"A recreational home is located within a resort that contains focal services and <br />complete recreational facilities. These dwellings are often second homes used <br />by the owner periodically or rented on a seasonal basis." <br />Land Use Code 260 does not differentiate between single-family dwellings and multi- <br />family dwellings; however, the clustering of units together does not impact the overall <br />travel characteristics of the Project. Since the restaurant and spa will only be used by <br />homeowners and guests, no external vehicular trips would be generated by these <br />services. The trip generation projection for the Project will be based on the worst-case <br />60 -unit scenario and is shown in Table 1. <br />Table 1 <br />Trip Generation <br />The trip generation project for the 60 -unit Project indicates that a total of 13 vehicles per <br />hour (vph) are anticipated during the AM commuter peak hour of traffic and a total of 17 <br />vph are anticipated during the PM commuter peak hour of traffic. <br />Conclusions <br />The following are the conclusions of the Traffic Assessment Study. <br />• The 60 -unit Project is the worst-case scenario and will generate 17 or less total trips <br />(enter and exit) during each of the AM and PM commuter peak hours of traffic. <br />• The peak hour traffic generated impacts of the proposed Project will be minimal due <br />to the low volume of traffic generated. <br />• The Project does not meet the minimum criteria of 50 peak hour trips specified in <br />Section 25-2-46 Concurrency Requirements of the Hawaii County Code regarding <br />the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis Report. The Project is anticipated to <br />generate 17 or less total trips and therefore, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report is not <br />required. <br />3 <br />AM Peak Hour of <br />PM Peak Hour of <br />Traffic <br />Traffic <br />No. of <br />Enter <br />Exit <br />Enter <br />Exit <br />Land Use Designation <br />Units <br />(vph) <br />(vph) <br />(vph) <br />(vph) <br />Recreational Homes <br />60 <br />9 <br />4 <br />7 <br />10 <br />The trip generation project for the 60 -unit Project indicates that a total of 13 vehicles per <br />hour (vph) are anticipated during the AM commuter peak hour of traffic and a total of 17 <br />vph are anticipated during the PM commuter peak hour of traffic. <br />Conclusions <br />The following are the conclusions of the Traffic Assessment Study. <br />• The 60 -unit Project is the worst-case scenario and will generate 17 or less total trips <br />(enter and exit) during each of the AM and PM commuter peak hours of traffic. <br />• The peak hour traffic generated impacts of the proposed Project will be minimal due <br />to the low volume of traffic generated. <br />• The Project does not meet the minimum criteria of 50 peak hour trips specified in <br />Section 25-2-46 Concurrency Requirements of the Hawaii County Code regarding <br />the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis Report. The Project is anticipated to <br />generate 17 or less total trips and therefore, a Traffic Impact Analysis Report is not <br />required. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.