Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 5 <br />■ Development shall not be permitted in natural hazard areas unless proper on-site <br />improvements are provided. <br />■ Development shall be located in areas where public utilities can be economically <br />provided at an adequate level to meet the demand for the concentrated service. <br />■ Recreational area and/or facilities shall be considered in multiple residential <br />development. <br />The subject, 51.058 -acre property is irregularly shaped property and situated at the <br />southern end of Alii Drive at the beginning of the Mamalahoa Highway Bypass, east <br />(mauka) of the highway and west (makai) of the Kona Country Club mauka golf course in <br />the Keauhou Resort. The subject parcel is currently vacant of any structures or other <br />improvements. The RM zoning and proposed development is consistent with other multiple <br />family/resort type uses in the surrounding area, which include the Kona Country Club mauka <br />golf course to the north and east (zoned Open), open space zoned A -5a west and south of the <br />site, and a future access road to the south. <br />The proposed development will be developed in accordance with the Zoning Code, <br />including the requirement to obtain a new Final Plan Approval, which will ensure <br />appropriate on-site parking, drainage and landscaping requirements will be met. <br />In addition, the proposed amendment meets the concurrency requirements of the <br />Zoning Code which address traffic, potable water, and Civil Defense Siren availability. <br />The applicant submitted two (2)Traffic Assessments (TA), conducted by Austin, <br />Tsutsumi & Associates for both the current proposed 29 -dwelling unit residential <br />development as well as a TA for a larger, 60 -dwelling unit development currently entitled by <br />density and SMA Use Permit for the project site. According to the latter TA, "The trip <br />generation projected for the 60 -unit project indicates that a total of 13 vehicles per hour <br />(vph) are anticipated during the AMcommuter peak hour of traffic and a total of 17 vph are <br />anticipated during the PMcommuter peak hour of traffic, and thus the Project does not meet <br />the minimum criteria of 50 peak hour trips specified in the Zoning Code's Concurrency <br />Requirements to require a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR). " <br />As previously stated, the applicant has a water allocation/commitment of sixty (60) <br />units available to the parcel. Condition C of the subject ordinance requires the applicant to <br />construct water improvements outlined in DWS' July 29, 2009 memorandum addressed to <br />the Planning Department prior to obtaining Certificate of <br />