Laserfiche WebLink
The applicant had retained the services of appropriate design professionals, <br />and construction plans were developed shortly after the rezoning was <br />approved. These included.plans for Plan Approval, Building Permit, and <br />Grading Permit. However, the heavy demands of the Applicant's medical <br />practice precluded a more focused attention to this project, resulting in having <br />misunderstandings with the initial contractor and a subsequent lengthy <br />litigation. <br />Concurrently, the Applicant also had to find ways to refinance the project. <br />This came at a time when Hawaii and the rest of the world were trying to <br />recover from -a major economic global meltdown and the financial crisis that <br />began in 2008. This added to the difficulty in securing the timely refinancing <br />of the project after expiration of the first 5 -year construction window. <br />Undaunted, however, the Applicant started to redesign the project with a new <br />architect and work with a different contractor to arrive -at a cost within its <br />budget. The revised plans have been approved by the County, and its building <br />permit is being withheld pending identification of a contractor and payment of <br />the filing fee.. This will be done immediately upon approval of the rezoning <br />time extension. During the interim, the Applicant has authorized the <br />contractor to do only the limited site work. <br />It is thus self-evident that the Applicant intends to do the project and <br />hopefully have it completed within the requested 5 -year window. <br />B. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or <br />Zoning Code. <br />It should be noted that since the site was rezoned, there has not been any , <br />significant land use regulatory change in this area. The Hilo Community <br />Development Plan has not been updated, and thus, the only relevant planning <br />policy document still rests with the County General Plan. <br />The proposed request is still not contrary to the General Plan's Land Use <br />Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map that defines the subject property <br />and its immediately surrounding area for Medium Density Urban uses. The <br />most recent revisions to the General Plan (February 2005) did not make any <br />changes affecting the subject site. The current designation on the LUPAG <br />map is the same as when the subject property was initially zoned CN -20. <br />There are a number of commercially -zoned and related uses proximate to the <br />subject site. Most notably, the proposed Wailani Project is situated west or <br />mauka of the subject site, while the Ka Waena Lapa'au Medical complex is <br />located at the intersection of Ponahawai Street and Komohana Street. Along <br />Ponahawai Street and less than five hundred (500) feet away, there is a new <br />medical office and physical therapy office. <br />H <br />