COM 1041.000 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FCC, In the Matter of Responsibility of the Fed. C0111171C111S Comm'n to Consider Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation When Authorizing the Use of Radiofrequency Devices. Potential Effects of A Reduction in the Allowable Level of Radiofrequency Radiation on FCC Authorized Commercial Services and Equipment, General Docket No. 79-144, Report and Order, 100 FCC 2d 543 (1985) 7, 12, 16 FCC, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Envtl. Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, ET Docket No. 93-62, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8 FCC Rcd 2849 (1993) 23 FCC, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, ET Docket No. 93-62, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15123 (1996) 23 FCC, In the Matter of Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure inv., WT Docket No. 17-79, Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order, 33 FCC Rcd 9088 (2018) 14, 22 FCC, In the Matter of Proposed Changes in the Commission's Rules Regarding Malian Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Reassessment of Fed. Commc'ns C0171111`11 Radiofrequency Exposure Limits & Policies Targeted Changes to the Commission's Rules Regarding Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Docket Nos. ET 03-137, 13-84, 19-226, FCC Rcd 2019 WL 6681944 (Dec. 4, 2019) 6, 9, 17 GAO, Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency to Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation (CED 78-79) (March 29, 1978).. 11 International Appeal, Scientists Call for Protection from Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure 26 J. Elder, RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION: ACTIVITIES AND ISSUES. U.S. En\ ironmental Protection A2ency, Washington. D.C.. EPA'600'D- 86:135 (NTIS P1386217155). 1986 13 Kenneth A. Jacobsen„4 Tale of Two Circuits: Curbs on Legal Remedies for Exposure to Potentially Harmful Cell Phone Radiation Emissions, 10 Seton Hall Circuit Review 1 , 2-3 (2013) 13 ix