My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1041.000 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 1041.000 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2020 12:51:05 PM
Creation date
8/14/2020 2:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
1041
Point
000
Author
Maile David, Council Member, and Matt Kaneali‘i-Kleinfelder, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2020-09-02 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Council
RES 714 Draft 01 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2018-2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE <br /> Amici are a national environmental organization and elected officials who <br /> support environmental and public health protections for all and seek inclusive <br /> decision-making processes. They rely on the National Environmental Policy Act <br /> (NEPA) to ensure that federal government decisions — such as the licensing of use <br /> of the spectrum to provide wireless services — are informed by the best available <br /> science and input from citizens affected by those decisions. <br /> The FCC's December 4, 2019 order compromises interests of amici in three <br /> critical ways: (1) The FCC failed to complete an Environmental Impact Statement <br /> under NEPA before terminating its inquiry into the adequacy of its radiofrequency <br /> (RF) standards. (2) The FCC's inadequate health standards excuse wireless service <br /> providers from conducting environmental review even though these services may <br /> expose humans and the environment in which they live to harmful radiation. (3) <br /> The FCC's order renders any environment review that is done inadequate because <br /> it is based on inadequate health standards. Rather than conduct new analysis of the <br /> potential environmental harm its actions may cause, the FCC will simply point to <br /> its decision in its December 4 order that its RF standards are adequate to satisfy <br /> NEPA. This might be fine if the FCC supported its decision with sufficient <br /> evidence. As explained by Petitioners, the Commission did not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.