COM 1041.000 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Telecommunications and Information Administration regarding its work to develop RF exposure guidelines. In Phase 1, EPA recommended moving forward immediately to address thermal impacts of RF radiation. In Phase 2, acknowledging potential non-thermal effects, EPA proposed convening a group of national experts to address "modulated and nonthermal exposures."38 Three months later, EPA informed the FCC that it would have final guidelines by early 199639 based on technical input from the Radiofrequency Interagency Work Group (RFIAWG)4° in which the FCC participated. EPA never completed this work.41 By eliminating EPA's funding for it, Congress gave the FCC the authority to control limits on RF radiation from wireless services. With that authority came responsibility. 38 Memorandum from Robert F. Cleveland, Office of Engineering and Technology to FCC Secretary, Ex Pante Presentation by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (March 22, 1995), at 6-7, see Addendum Exh. D. 39 Letter from E. Ramona Trovata, EPA, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, to Richard M. Smith, Chief, FCC, Office of Engineering and Technology (June 19, 1995), see Addendum Exh. E. 4° The RFIAWG was established in 1995 by the EPA which chaired the group. It is made up of representatives from federal agencies with a stake in RF issues. Its purpose is to coordinate/exchange information related to RF exposures and advise federal agencies accordingly. The RFIAWG has not met in the last two years. 41 In a July 8, 2020, letter to Theodora Scarato, Executive Director, Environmental Health Trust, EPA's Director of the Radiation Protection Division, Lee Ann B. Veal, confirms that EPA's "last review [of the research on damage to memory by cell phone radiation] was in the 1984 document Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (EPA 600/8-83-026F). The EPA does not currently have a funded mandate for radiofrequency matters." See Addendum Exh. F.