My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1041.000 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 1041.000 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2020 12:51:05 PM
Creation date
8/14/2020 2:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
1041
Point
000
Author
Maile David, Council Member, and Matt Kaneali‘i-Kleinfelder, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2020-09-02 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Council
RES 714 Draft 01 2018-2020
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2018-2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT <br /> Given the impact the challenged FCC order will have on this court's <br /> previous decision in.NRDC's favor related to environmental review, undersigned <br /> counsel for amici respectfully requests the opportunity to participate in oral <br /> argument. NRDC successfully challenged a 2018 order by the Federal <br /> Communications Commission that had proposed to eliminate environmental and <br /> historic review for certain cell towers and other wireless infrastructure. United <br /> Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. FCC, 933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir. 2019). <br /> The FCC's 2019 order challenged by Petitioners in this case renders such <br /> environmental review meaningless. Under the challenged Order, environmental <br /> review is tied to the RF limits set by the FCC. As long as a wireless service <br /> provider certifies that the construction it proposes meets the FCC's RF standards, <br /> no environmental analysis is required. The FCC's arbitrary determination that <br /> the limits set in 1996 are still adequate today means that environmental review <br /> will not occur where it would otherwise if the FCC had followed the mandates of <br /> reasoned decision-making under the Administrative Procedure Act. <br /> /s/ Sharon Buccino <br /> Counsel for Amid Curiae, <br /> Naturcll Resources Defense Council et al. <br /> Dated: August 5, 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.