Laserfiche WebLink
Aaron S.Y. Chung, Council Chair <br />and Members of the County Council <br />County of Hawaii <br />Page 2 <br />One (1) 4.299 -acre lot situated on the western side of the subject parcel for a proposed <br />affordable housing development to include 36 "units" in seven (7) quad-plex and four (4) <br />duplex buildings. According to the applicant, 60% to 80% of the units will be affordable <br />to households with incomes at or below 140% of the median income. <br />Three (3) lots situated on the eastern side of the subject property totaling 5.971 acres <br />which are slated for commercial development, including the possible future development <br />of a hardware store. <br />Five (5) commercial lots situated on the southern side of the subject property, each with a <br />minimum land area of approximately 12,840 square feet (total 1.437 acres) to be sold to <br />various commercial developers; and <br />One (1) road lot, consisting of an entrance to Waikoloa Road, a cul-de-sac, and access <br />road to the largest (residential) lot. <br />Tentative plans call for securing subdivision approval by the end of 2020. Thereafter, the <br />applicant will construct the necessary improvements within the subdivision. The estimated <br />timeframe to complete the infrastructure improvements and obtain final subdivision approval is <br />approximately 24 months. The estimated cost of improvements for this proposed project is <br />$4001000. <br />Based on Chapter 28 of the Hawaii County Code and Planning Commission Rule 13, the <br />approval for the reclassification of the State Land Use District Boundary Amendment requires that <br />the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable goals, policies, standards, and courses of <br />action of the General Plan and implementing ordinances, plans and documents. No amendment shall <br />be approved unless it conforms to the General Plan. However, a proposed amendment may be <br />combined with a request to amend the General Plan. <br />The request to reclassify the property to the State Land Use Urban District would be <br />inconsistent with the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map for this <br />area, which is designated as Open and Rural. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) <br />Map component of the General Plan (GP) is a representation of the document's goals and policies to <br />guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. The LUPAG map reflects a graphic <br />depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses and establishes the basic urban <br />and non -urban form for areas within the County. <br />This proposed request to reclassify the district boundary from Agricultural to Urban, along <br />with the change the zoning of the subject parcel to CV -10, does not conform with the General Plan <br />LUPAG map which designates most of the property as open (o) and a smaller portion as rural (rur). <br />