COM 1076.000 2018-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

L . ; Megan Isaac, resident Hilo (frequent visitor to Kona's coastline) I have reviewed other testimony on this very.matter and include it here: The Kona coastline should remain free from urbanization to the maximum -extent possible. There are costs involved in urbanizing the Kona coastline. Keeping development mauka of the highway protects water quality and scenic vistas. Kona is unique as is its airport. Just because many not all airports have hotels nearby does not justify compromising Kona's uniqueness. Too often, efficiency is .used to justify degradation of environmental integrity. `Nuff already. A win-win solution is leaving things as they have been for decades. The plan to rezone in order to build a hotel would increase urbanization on coastal land. It is a bad idea that contravenes all this community has fought for for decades with so much sacrifice and hard-won success. Why are we focusing on hotel room creation above alternative, more sustainable ways to use state land and government effort? The last thing we need are more hotel rooms. Or, does this island have to suffer the inevitable indignities that led to the monster that is Honolulu? Please look at other ways to keep our people and our island safe and with a viable future rather than increasing the urban or resort use of public land. With the lesson of covid-19 and volcanic eruptions, it's madness to put more eggs into the tourism basket. Kona isn't like most airports. We're an end -of -the road destination where short intentional layovers don't take place and relatively few happen due to weather or other issues (like San Francisco or even Phoenix where high heat can hold up flights which are, again, connecting flights are often affected and not something which Kona has). This rare "need" doesn't seem like it affects enough people or is dire enough when our financial resources have been ravaged from covid-19 and recent past volcanic 2