My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1075.001 2018-2020
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2018-2020
>
COM 1075.001 2018-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 2:32:30 PM
Creation date
9/25/2020 10:10:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2018-2020
Communication
1075
Point
001
Author
Micheal Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2020/10/20 (2018-2020)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2018-2020\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2021/01/19 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2021/02/02 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
does help the community, obviously with mitigating measures. So, with that, I'm happy to <br />answer any questions. <br />CARR SMITH: Very good, thank you. Thank you for that. All right, Commissioners? <br />Mr. Van Pernis. <br />VAN PERNIS: Yes, I'd like to ask if the applicants are willing to commit to building a turn lane <br />into their project? <br />KERN: Commissioner Van Pernis, I believe that a further discussion - - - to occur with DPW <br />and the applicants can speak to this, but as far as I'm aware, Within reason the applicants are <br />willing to do what they need to do to allow the project tol move`forward and provide the <br />necessary level of safety. <br />VAN PERNIS: Will they commit at this point?, They'll go to DPW and try to negotiate to have <br />some other resolution? I'm asking whether they will commit now in this =proceeding. <br />CARR SMITH: Mr. Van Perris, I don't, personally -don't think -that it's appropriate for us to ask <br />them to commit to something that they�don't know about yet., I think DPW Will make the <br />determination as what is needed, and -then they'll be facedWith that at that time. <br />KERN: And I will say this that, that there -will need to be, prior to the hardware store going in, <br />there will need to be a TIARJraffic Impact Analysis -Report. We Will have traffic engineer and <br />they will work with DPW to, again, make sure. that the project is safe. <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you. Commissioners, I"d like some input on this. Mr. Vitousek. <br />VITOUSEK:. -Yeah,_ I was just wondering -about the history with Waikoloa Mauka, LLC, if this <br />was part of -the land where the zoning was reverted? _ <br />KERN: It,' -it was, it's all part:of that Whole original project. Maija or Jeff— <br />VITOUSEK:" -Could, could yougive a— <br />KERN: —can you --jump in on that? <br />VITOUSEK: Can you give -a -brief discussion of what the land use boundaries were and then are <br />now reverted to? <br />KERN: Jeff? <br />DARROW: I can speak to that. The previous State Land Use Boundary, Boundary for that <br />particular property reflected the zoning. So where you see Open Zoning, the General or the— <br />I'm sorry—the State Land Use for the entire project, as well as Waikoloa Mauka, was Rural. <br />And so, there was a pretty lengthy State Land Use Commission reversion hearing where they <br />ended up reverting the State Land Use District Boundary Amendment back to Agriculture. And <br />11 <br />DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.