Laserfiche WebLink
component we're addressing here is that Commercial aspect. And correct me if I'm wrong on <br />that one. <br />CARR SMITH: Mr. Van Pernis. <br />VAN PERNIS: Thank you, Madam Chair. To put it simply, this application is not ready for <br />prime time. Maybe later, maybe with all the bases covered. The applicant needs to cover all the <br />bases, not blame someone else. He needs to do it all himself. So, I would join in the previous <br />statements. <br />CARR SMITH: [Responding to Mr. Darrow raising his hand] Jeff, I'd just like to finish with <br />the Commissioners, if I could, please. Faye, do you have any comments? <br />YATES: No. <br />CARR SMITH: No? Okay. Go ahead, Jeff. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Madam Chair. Just a, just for clarity' --in these types:of situations where <br />we have two applications, we normally, will take them separately. So, although we have a <br />motion on the floor for two applicatioris,'we really should be "focusing on one at a"time, and then, <br />you know, resolve one motion, and then-mpve on to the next`motion. <br />CARR SMITH: Understood, understood. I=.have a real- hard time supporting an unfavorable <br />recommendation here. -I'm not saying that�it's ready for a favorable,..but I wouldn't support the <br />motion right now. I, would rather see some other type of action taken to extend and revisit. But I <br />won't be supporting the -motion. Any other discussion? Go ahead, Mike. <br />VITOUSEK And, .you know;iI .agree with -you there. I, I believe that the, the option of deferral <br />is always'a possibility: -:,Is that- something"that the, applicants would be okay with, or is it hard and <br />fast you need an answer, today? <br />CARR SMITH: Zendo? <br />KERN: Thank you; ,and thankyou, all for the, for the consideration on this. Correct me if I'm <br />wrong, Mr. Julkowski -but we've been open to having a discussion and dialogue and working <br />through these and we have, I, have personally been on this for over a year with multiple meetings <br />with the Planning Department;=,trying to find, you know, a, a, a balance. I think it's also <br />understood why we haven't, -you know, Mr. Julkowski hasn't invested significant more amounts <br />of money on some of these things, that might help it when the Department is, you know, kind of <br />adamantly against it at the moment, and with already the outlay of cash. You know, to put it <br />simply, our side has been open to figuring something out that, that can be supported and <br />favorable and work well with the community and have a general all-around win-win, without, <br />without question— <br />CARR SMITH: - - - the goal. <br />24 <br />DRAFT <br />