Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: Number 2. <br />VAN PERNIS: And there is a number of things in that section, I think—no, it's not - - - <br />CARR SMITH: I have the email in front of me, and it looks as though it's paragraph, the paragraph <br />that's numbered "2," Mark. <br />VAN PERNIS: Number 2. <br />CARR SMITH: The one that says, "The applicants are not the real applicants," then talks about <br />your conversation with Mr. Rapoza. <br />VAN PERNIS: Okay, so we are striking—I got it—we are striking -the reference to Mr. Rapoza, my <br />conversation with him— <br />CARR SMITH: We are striking Item No. 2. <br />VAN PERNIS: —that would be the first sentence and the= <br />CARR SMITH: What is the motion= <br />VAN PERNIS: —last sentence. <br />CARR SMITH: Excuse.me, Mark <br />VAN PERNIS: First and last sentences of No. 2 and all of the unnumbered in parentheses section <br />beginning with the words,"Some Commissioners." by the way— <br />CARR SMITH: - - - that's your -input, let's see— <br />VAN PERNIS: —one of the -'.commissioners asked me that question. <br />CARR SMITH: Mr: Vitousek, wh 's your intention on the motion, please? <br />- t <br />VITOUSEK: The intention of the'motion is to strike any discussion on the previous deposition <br />between Commissioner Van Perris and Mr. Cook, and also to strike any reference to discussions <br />and/or investigation outside' -,of the scope of the Leeward Planning Commission, or reference to Mr., <br />discussion with Mr. Rapoza. <br />CARR SMITH: All right, so that's all of the first paragraph on the email, and on Item No. 2—I <br />don't know where that ends, unless we just say Number 2 that we strike. You guys have the email in <br />front of you? <br />KEALOHA: I do, and my second was to the assumption that 1 and 2 be stricken. <br />9 <br />DRAFT <br />