Laserfiche WebLink
VAN PERNIS: So in essence you are saying they are asking for up to 25 years from the original <br />KAY: No, sir, what I'm saying— <br />VAN PERNIS: —original— <br />KAY: —yeah, I'm, I'm telling you what they are asking for right now moving forward. Where we <br />are at right now is we accepted the applications for time extension and we are where we are at. So <br />from 2004 to here, 2020, they are asking for an additional ten years to complete, for substantial <br />completion of construction. <br />VAN PERNIS: And what happens, if they don't meet their requirement? <br />KAY: Then they have an opportunity to come back and ask for additional time, or the Planning <br />Director has an opportunity to start proceedings for,a reversion or charge ,it to a more appropriate <br />zoning as the condition allows. <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you, Christian._ Are there any more questions for staff?. All right, very good, <br />thank you, Maija and Christian. Let's move on to the applicant's presentation. I'm trying to see <br />who we have on here. Sidney Fuke is here. ':Ken Van Bergen_; are you on? Randall Okaneku, you <br />are here. Yes? <br />OKANEKU: Yes. <br />4 <br />CARR SMITH: Thank you. Do you,have anyone else, Sid, that's part of your group? I don't know <br />who this one phoned. Somebody is calling in that's from a 557 number. Is that part of your group? <br />FUKE: .That's =can you hear ,me? <br />CARR SMITH: Yes. <br />FUKE: Yeah; -that's probably Ken Van Bergen calling in, because he had to leave, and then so he <br />mentioned that if there is a need "Or his verbal testimony— <br />CARR <br />CARR SMITH: Okay. <br />FUKE: - - - <br />CARR SMITH: Okay, and is Brian Cook here today? <br />FUKE: Yeah, Brian is over here sitting in front of me, yes. <br />CARR SMITH: Oh, he's with you, okay, all right. All right, so all of you involved, I'd like to <br />swear you in all together, please. Anyone who is going, planning on speaking, raise your right hand. <br />Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth in this matter before the Leeward Planning Commission? <br />17 <br />DRAFT <br />