My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0029.000 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0029.000 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2021 8:52:09 AM
Creation date
12/14/2020 8:30:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0029
Point
000
Author
Ashley L. Kierkiewicz, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
GOREDC
Comments
GOREDC: Filed - 01/05/21
Document Relationships
AGE GOREDC 2021/01/05 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Governmental Operations, Relations and Economic Development Committee (GOREDC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2017 <br />S.B. No. 562 originally introduced to extend Act 170 to June 30, 2021, was <br />amended by deleting its contents and amended to require the Attorney General to <br />defend any civil action based on the negligence, wrongful act, or omission of a county <br />lifeguard for services at a designated beach park under an agreement between the <br />State and a county. This amendment is probably the result of testimony submitted by <br />the Hawaii Association for Justice, which testified that: <br />"...the liability of County lifeguards at State beach parks is the responsibility of <br />the State, not the counties, because the State is liable for the .liability of "State <br />Employees" under the State Tort Liability Act. <br />...the State Department of the Attorney General is specifically authorized to <br />defend the counties in cases brought against them because of county lifeguards <br />stationed at State beach parks." <br />S.B. No. 562 was passed by the Legislature, but vetoed by the Governor, who <br />objected to the bill, "[b]ecause the Attorney General would be required to defend a <br />lawsuit brought against the counties for any "wrongful" act of a lifeguard, and not just <br />acts that are within the scope of the lifeguard's employment..." <br />Justification <br />The reasons remain for providing liability protection for county lifeguards for any <br />damages arising from the acts or omissions of the lifeguards while providing rescue, <br />resuscitative, or other lifeguard services in the scope of employment as a county <br />lifeguard, except for civil damages arising from a county lifeguard's gross negligence or <br />wanton act or omission. <br />The prospect of large damage suits contributes to the costs of insurance and the <br />reluctance to providing lifeguards. Lifeguards and the State or county must have <br />immunity so that lifeguards can at least be provided on the beaches. <br />"[Liability protection for county lifeguards] is necessary for individual lifeguards -as <br />well as their employing counties to be able to provide services for the State of <br />Hawaii at Kaena Point State Park on Oahu, Hapuna Beach on Hawaii Island, <br />Makena Beach on Maui, and Ke'e Beach on Kauai. These four beaches are <br />popularly used by the public and would be where drownings and serious injuries <br />occur if lifeguard services were not provided. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.