Laserfiche WebLink
induced stress I believe and 1.8 isn't that much more than 1.5. Anyway, that's my comment on <br />it. Thank you. <br />RAFFIPIY: Great, any other discussions? <br />CLARKSON: Yes, I just liked to clarify my view of the parking issue as I seconded the motion. <br />I didn't hear anything from the Director or from Planning Staff that contradicted Mr. Rock's <br />assertation that the actual Code minimum of 1.25 was typically ample for this kind of <br />development. And that when the Director was talking about a possiblejehange from 1.8 to 1.5 <br />his concern was more for certainty rather than the actual number. So I would support the 1.5. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Any other comments? If no comments -staff-t-ake the roll call vote. <br />AGUINALDO: Commissioner Raffipiy, I have one. <br />RAFFIPIY: Go ahead. <br />AGUINALDO: Just clarification. Is removing Condif o_J ucorr6ct?= And leaving=it up to Public <br />Works to make their necessary recommendation for anything_ to do with traffic devices. Am I <br />understanding that correctly Commissioners? <br />KAY: That's correct. <br />AGUINALDO: <br />Okay, I yield. <br />RAFFIPIY: Alright, any other, ani other comments, questions? Okay staff take the roll call <br />voter please. <br />KAY: Yes, thank_,you Mr. Chair-Comrrissioner Au? <br />FEW <br />KAY: Commissioner Clarksa? <br />CLARKS0N:Aye, e= <br />KAY: Commissioner= k i -aldc <br />AGUINALDO,: Aye. <br />KAY: Commissioner Replogle? <br />REPLOGLE: Aye. <br />KAY: And Chair Raffipiy? <br />? <br />EXHIBIT A (DRAFT) <br />26 <br />