My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0018.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0018.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2021 1:19:44 PM
Creation date
12/14/2020 1:30:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0018
Point
001
Author
Michael Yee, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/01/05 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicating the Police Department's concerns they indicated they thought the Zoning Code <br />required one and a quarter spaces would be sufficient for the project. <br />So, based on that and to try address the Police Department's concerns and to provide clarity on <br />what that number of additional spaces should be because the way that the condition is written is <br />very ambiguous and open to a lot of interpretation. The Director is recommending that we <br />amend Condition E to require 1.8 parking spaces per dwelling unit which would be 116 spaces at <br />full build out if they build the 64 -units. So, basically the Director at this point is locking in that <br />number. The Director under our Zoning Code has the authority to detennine or require more <br />parking than what the Code requires. If he or she sees that there's gq ft fo be a community <br />benefit or benefit public safety and at this point the Director is making that determination and <br />articulating proposing to amend the condition to articulate that n tle=ondition E. <br />Again, this is one of those situations where if for whatevef=reason the affocble housing <br />development does not get developed then it would just -Of all back to the originafcondition. So, <br />again just to recap the Director's recommendation,is 10 forward --a favorable re&or nendation to <br />the County Council for the Applicant's proposed= amendments t6%Condition E & G Wfavorable <br />recommendation with modifications to Conditions P & -Rand "YN—i favorable recommendation <br />for the proposed amendment to Condition J of rezone Ordince 10 32. <br />I want to point out that after we sent our bac <br />pieces of correspondence. First would be ai <br />and then we also received a correspondence <br />time extension request to the Department of <br />comments and <br />may have and unless s <br />sharing that right now <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank,,y_o <br />Commission-er n <br />AU:-, you Chair <br />develonmerit? <br />KAY: Sure, <br />AU: So, my questio <br />entrances of the prop <br />MMith,that I am haj <br />of the`conditions req <br />pl <br />and recommendation report we got two (2) <br />3.m Ann Toni concerns about traffic <br />°isth_Ball which is a water commitment <br />upply`addessing some of Water Supply's <br />to answer -any questions that the Commission <br />the presentation I'll go ahead and stop <br />the Commission? Go ahead <br />can you bring up that screen with the proposed <br />Cght have missed it but the egress and the in and the out of both <br />- Can you point that out again to me? <br />KAY: Sure, will one moment please. So, here is the proposed site plan. The Kapi`olani Street <br />entrance would be here and I believe there is a condition of approval on Kapi`olani Street which <br />limits it to right in, right out. Let me find that condition of approval here. That's been maintain <br />through this amendment request and then the Kukuau Street ingress/egress is going to be toward <br />the top of this screen here. <br />EXHIBIT A (DRAFT) <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.