Laserfiche WebLink
CARR SMITH: Mark, Mark, hello— <br /> VAN PERNIS: Hello, perhaps the Planning Department could note in the motion the, too, these <br /> sections that are referred to where we are substituting eastern boundary for Makalei Drive. <br /> CARR. SMITH: Is that an amendment to the motion? Do you understand— <br /> VAN PERNIS: Yeah, I would include that in the motion, include the sections. I gave them to <br /> the Planning Department. <br /> CARR SMITH: Mike, are you in agreement as the— <br /> VITOUSEK: I don't really understand what the amendment is to the motion, I'm sorry. <br /> VAN PERNIS: It is to identify the paragraph numbers in the proposed ordinance, instead of just <br /> a generic referral. <br /> VITOUSEK: And are you going to identify them specifically now, or is that-if it's a generic <br /> referral, then we can let the county go through it and eliminate that language. <br /> VAN PERNIS: I agree with that. We can let the county go through it and eliminate the <br /> language— <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> VAN PERNIS: or substitute the language. <br /> CARR SMITH: Maija, are you clear with the motion? <br /> JACKSON: I'm clear with the motion, but I want to make sure that the county is not, I want to <br /> make sure that the county is okay with Condition Y, and that the county Water Supply still has <br /> the ability to go into Makalei Estates and work on its waterlines. So, can Roger or Steve confirm <br /> to me that there are easements within Makalei Drive in favor of the county to maintain the <br /> county's waterlines? <br /> HARRIS: Yes, there are. We confirm that. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. <br /> CARR SMITH: Then why would we take the language out? I don't understand what the benefit <br /> is to remove that sentence. <br /> JACKSON: Yeah, I, I really don't understand the benefit, either, because the county will be <br /> coming in working on the waterline. <br /> 37 <br /> DRAFT <br />