My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0050.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0050.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 2:32:30 PM
Creation date
1/7/2021 8:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0050
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/02/02 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JACKSON: So the motion is related to rezone 05-000010, and is to amend ordinance 09 132 as <br /> recommended by the planning director, with two changes: One is to substitute the words <br /> "Palamanui's eastern property boundary"with any references to Mdkdlei Drive connection; and <br /> then the second change is to amend Condition Y by adding some language so that it reads, <br /> "except for construction work within easements of record within Mdkdlei Estates on the water <br /> system." That's my understanding of the motion. Is that correct, Mr. Van Perris? <br /> VAN PERNIS: That's fine with me. <br /> VITOUSEK: What, I'm sorry, what was the first part of the motion? Was that just editing the <br /> condition, or was that offering a recommendation for the overall? <br /> JACKSON: The motion is to <br /> CARR SMITH: Can you refer to the recommendation, please? <br /> JACKSON: The motion was to forward a favorable recommendation to the County Council as <br /> recommended by the planning director, with those two changes that I mentioned. <br /> VAN PERNIS: I didn't make the motion for favorable recommendation. I think that my motion, <br /> seconded by Mr. Vitousek, would be an amendment to wherever the referral is. If someone <br /> would care to make a motion that would be seconded, then this would be an amendment to that. <br /> JACKSON: Okay, so the motion was just relating to amending the conditions, not— <br /> VITOUSEK: That's— <br /> JACKSON: --okay, thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: —that's what I seconded, not, not the favorable. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: And— <br /> CARR SMITH: Mr. Newberg. Go ahead, Max. <br /> NEWBERG: Thank you, Chair Smith—Mike, did you want to finish there right before I came? <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure, I just, procedurally, there is another amendment that I would like to add, and <br /> I don't know if you want to take that now or, as part of this motion, or if you want to vote on this <br /> and then move on to the next. <br /> CARR SMITH: Hmm, well, we are doing this a little differently than we usually do, so we are <br /> going to vote on amendments. I'd rather see whether- <br /> 41 <br /> DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.