COM 0052.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i i VAN PERNIS: Yeah, I don't think the, it's clear at all. I think the thing needs to be rewritten and I agree with Commissioner Vitousek, as to what he says. What the [inaudible] medical services, for instance physical therapy outfits have a doctor that come in, there's other forms of, well it might be called medical service or unconventional raiku [sic], screen therapy, cupping, I think that all needs to be, we need better definition. In that regard I would move to defer this until the next meeting and have the items rewritten to satisfy some of these [inaudible], in particular regards to people coming to mobile services. What does that mean? Service in a truck or driving down to a house? VITOUSEK: Second. DARROW: Could I chime in real quick before the vote? CARR SMITH: Yes Jeff. DARROW: The intention of this bill wasn't to try to identify all the different types of services out there because number one, there are a number of services, there's going to be future services that we're unaware of. What we wanted to try to do is clarify that there's these,types of services that provide some sort of health-related service that we wanted to be able to give an opportunity and clear direction as to how they go about either being permitted or if they are permitted in a zoning district. This bill wasn't at all touching any type of mobile use. The medical definition that you see has been in the code for, since 1996.Ldon't know if it was the same prior to that. All we did in this particular amendment was clarify that the medical clinic does not include these uses because we were clearlyseparating those uses. I don't know what you're specifically asking the Department to do as far as you know, revising this bill or changing it or including additional things. That would be what we need, specific direction. VAN PERNIS: Well it's not clear and I think it needs amendment. And I so moved to defer for a rewrite and Mr. Vitousek has seconded it. CARR SMITH: Oh, that's not,that was not an actual motion was it? Did I miss something? VAN PERNIS: Yes it was a motion. CARR SMITH: Oh, I;didn't hear. I didn't hear that. VAN PERNIS: It was to defer, deferral to the next meeting which a revised matter will be submitted, and I believe that was seconded by Mr. Vitousek. CARR SMITH: Oh, my apologies, I didn't under--, I didn't hear that that was a motion. Director Yee? YEE: Hi, so, I recall having earlier discussions with staff around how much to define or not to define things, and I do want to refer to section 20—Chapter 25-1-5 [Chapter 25, Section 25-1-5], which has definitions for medical clinic. And as we got into trying to define too much we just, we did decide that it's defined in the code, we weren't going to repeat it here, and so,there is a 7 EXHIBIT G