My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0052.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0052.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 2:32:31 PM
Creation date
1/7/2021 12:56:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0052
Point
001
Author
Norren Kato, TA for Zendo Kern Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/01/19 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2021/02/02 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Yeah, I again, I just, I feel like us now at the end of a long day to try to come up <br /> with an acceptable definition for medical clinic, we're more likely to miss something that could <br /> be addressed if there were more time to take a good look at how we fit our implied definition of <br /> medical clinic into the written definition, and if we take a month to do that and come back and <br /> we have a good definition that we all agree with, I think that's better for everybody than for us to <br /> try to put something together now. <br /> CARR SMITH: Jeff. <br /> DARROW: So, the commission needs to keep in mind that this is a bill that is going before <br /> Council, and that it goes before the Windward Planning Commission as well. So, whatever <br /> proposed,proposed amendments that you're making, we would want it, we get in a place where <br /> if we're not able to present it to the Windward Commission, then we're kind of stuck. Because <br /> then if we come here and it's approved differently, we go up to Council with separate bills. <br /> VITOUSEK: Then can we not provide specific language here, but just the recommendation for a <br /> revision to include that topic? <br /> DARROW: Sure. <br /> VITOUSEK: And so— <br /> DARROW: What we can do is— <br /> VITOUSEK: What is the best way of doing that? Would thatbeapproving it with recommended <br /> revisions, or would that be deferring it? <br /> DARROW: Again, if we defer, we would end up having to defer the Windward until, you know, <br /> I mean we're kind of stuck, but if you were to ask the Director to consider amendments to the <br /> medical clinic definition,to come up with a more specific definition, we can work on getting that <br /> put together and maybe even consult with you on it and then present it to the Windward <br /> Commission as well. But again, it wouldn't be something that we could vote on right now <br /> because it's not available. <br /> CARR SMITH: Director Yee?How do you feel about that? <br /> YEE: You know, I guess it's more of what the commission feels comfortable with. If, if, I hear <br /> Jeff, and that yes, there is a timing issue, but we're also not, we're not up against a clock that <br /> something's expiring here that has to get done, right, so if, if Windward has to wait for us to <br /> clarify the language to show to Leeward, then we take the time to do so. If we want to expedite <br /> and we have some flexibility to make changes more on the fly to present something to Windward <br /> that we think might, might make sense to Leeward, and we all have the flexibility to, to still <br /> proceed to Council, we're doing go. I'm not sure that's what I'm hearing from, from Mike, and <br /> again, I think this is more about what the Commission needs than it is the Planning Department <br /> trying to drive a certain timeline. <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.