My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0143.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0143.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:30:56 PM
Creation date
2/26/2021 10:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0143
Point
001
Author
Jeffrey W. Darrow, Deputy Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/03/17 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REPLOGLE: Yes. <br /> DARROW: We do have the Applicant's present. I am not sure if you would want to ask if they <br /> want to chime in. <br /> AU: Mr. Chair, I would like the Applicant's to chime in please. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. So, are Mr. Souza or Ms. Mulliken available? <br /> MULLIKEN: Yes, can you hear me? <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay,here she is. Yes. <br /> MULLIKEN: I do not know if you can see me here or nofi --_-_ <br /> REPLOGLE: Acknowledged by nodding his head-4mould you raise your rlght`hand lease, do <br /> you swear to affirm the truth before this Commissiffi <br /> MULLIKEN: Yes. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, please proceed. <br /> MULLIKEN: I would just want to say thank youvery much for all of your time in hearing this <br /> today. Tracie that was a very impressive presentatia there thank you. You said everything that <br /> I would have said, you pretty In laid it all out as you seen, ere,we did do this rezoning back <br /> in 2011 with the sole purpose of building an automobile shop for my other half Donny. I'm sure <br /> he is listening,but heir working right now so, I'm not,sure if he would be able to chime in. But <br /> we have the full intention to=go forward-with it but, lrfe took a different path for us and we <br /> decided not to--p sue it and yeah,z the house a few years ago. We have no <br /> intention to move forward with the,proposed dwelling or utilize the zoning and we've had the <br /> house for-=gale for 2 years now with_�o_luck because of the zoning. Everybody just wants a <br /> resldentlaLproperty and unfortunately this was holding it up. <br /> For us, we thohht based on the bill when we read it, we assumed that it would automatically go <br /> back to the RS40111and just recently last year I was notified that it does not automatically change <br /> and that we would have to go through this process. We did not understand that at the time, that's <br /> why we requestedthis;: We do have a buyer for the property and our proposed closing date is <br /> February 16th,but we still haven't heard back on anything further and they have no wish to <br /> utilize the zoning as well. I believe you guys had got a letter their realtor as well as our letters as <br /> well. So, if you have any questions just please let me know but, thank you very much for <br /> everything. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Any questions fellow Commissioners? <br /> RAFFIPIY: Mr. Chair, I have a question. <br /> EXHIBIT C(DRAFT) <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.