My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0218.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0218.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 9:39:52 AM
Creation date
4/22/2021 2:30:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0218
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/05/04 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Hold on, Commissioner Van Pernis,hold on. I think, Director Kern, would you <br /> like to take that? <br /> KERN: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Yeah, the property would basically go back to the state that it's <br /> in right now; it'd still be zoned, but it would be stale, so you wouldn't be able to complete the <br /> subdivision. <br /> MR. YOUNG: Okay. <br /> KERN: And for it to go all the way back to, say, Ag, then the director at that point would have <br /> the opportunity to do a planning director-initiated downzoning`to,bring it back to Ag. <br /> VITOUSEK: Basically, the same situation that we are in now. <br /> KERN: Correct. <br /> VITOUSEK: But, like you said, we are hoping nottto get there. <br /> MRS. YOUNG: Right, right. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br /> MRS. YOUNG: Do you mind if I mention, or add something <br /> VITOUSEK: Go ahead, of course. <br /> MRS. YOUNG: I believe one of the conditions for the Mahis to switch it from Ag to the <br /> Residential was to finalize the subdivision, so that's why our goal is to get this finalized. And I, <br /> wasn't sure how far back it would go, if we couldn't. But absolutely, we are not planning on <br /> taking longer than five years, Lord willing. <br /> VITOUSEK:`Okay. Commissioner Van Pernis. <br /> VAN PERNIS: 'Yes: Could you answer the question,please'? Are you willing to have, or to <br /> make, a new application, if you don't complete the subdivision within the five years referred to <br /> in this amended ordinance? And,I want to point out that it's planning director's discretion on <br /> whether it goes to Ag zoning, and I for one would be opposed to that; it makes no sense to go <br /> back to Ag zoning, it should stay Residential. But I'm asking again, if you'll answer the <br /> question, yes or no; are you willing to complete the subdivision in five years, and if not, submit a <br /> new application? <br /> VITOUSEK: I think that, I think the applicants have stated their intention to complete the <br /> application within five years, and they've stated their intention to follow any relevant required <br /> procedures thereafter. So I think that's a closed matter. Are there.any other questions? <br /> Commissioner Carr Smith. <br /> 12 <br /> DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.