My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0233.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0233.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2021 12:02:26 PM
Creation date
5/6/2021 9:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0233
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/05/18 (2020-2022)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G. YAMANAKA: If I can add, I think what spurred it was we had a few applicants looking for <br /> approval of use and the process to do it took so long and the answers we got back were vague <br /> and the reasoning behind it was that we had the Open zoning and we had reverted back to that. <br /> So, it had never really been an issue prior to that in our mind and so once that happened in <br /> talking with the ownership group, I said this is'something we really need to address. We did start <br /> this I want to say maybe a year or 2 years ago so it's been along process just to get here. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. <br /> LIN: Thank you. -_ <br /> ROY: Raised hand. - - <br /> REPLOGLE: Alex? _ - <br /> ROY: I just want to add that when the Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency <br /> (BDHRA)was active Garth came in front of the agency and presented tlfelhisjory. He gave a <br /> really cogent presentation on that and Banyan Drive that ageniey sent a letter of-support for this <br /> rezoning and I'm with Garth I think that was 2 plus years ago that we started thsp_rocess. So, <br /> he's been working this at least with myself_for the past couple years. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Anything further Commissioners?' .=_ <br /> ti <br /> CLARKS ON: Raisedhand <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Clarkson? <br /> 7-17 <br /> CLARKSON One hast question and this=is_also for the Planning Director. I assume that this is <br /> not the only lion conforming use n Open zoned areasthat have been grandfathered in over the <br /> decades and I also assumebut want to conform=with you that there's virtually no money for <br /> eminerif4 main condemnation and buying out of owners of non-conforming properties in order <br /> to make the property use conforming Is that the case that that is not a possibility that this <br /> be <br /> property could _ aturned into park or some other recreational facility that would conform to the <br /> existing Open zoning. <br /> KERN: Commissioner yes, this is not the only property in this type of situation. I do <br /> not have the data on the --6-#01-40 the other properties and you are also correct that to my <br /> knowledge there are no funding sources available at this time especially in the current economic <br /> situation that we are in to really even begin to entertain that at this time. I would say the only <br /> other focus would be more on the Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources <br /> Preservation Commission (PONC) which would be related to them acquiring like open spaces <br /> and there's a lot work for them to do there. I don't think this would fit into that criteria maybe at <br /> some point in the future Federal monies could be available I don't see it from a County budget <br /> standpoint happening for"—" I couldn't even begin to venture when. Does that answer your <br /> question? <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.