My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0235.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0235.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2021 12:02:26 PM
Creation date
5/6/2021 9:01:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0235
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/05/18 (2020-2022)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AU: Hi, Mr. Arai, long time no see. <br /> ARAI: Good morning. <br /> AU: Good morning, I hope you're doing well. <br /> • <br /> ARAI: I have been, thank you. Likewise, hopefully you all have been well as well. <br /> AU: Question for you Mr. Arai, so I guess the concerns that were raised by the neighbors, I <br /> guess you mentioned that Ms. Kagimoto has addressed those questions and is Mr. Carvalho <br /> happy with it? === <br /> ARAI: I would not say or represent that he is happy. I'm tore he is still concerned because I'm <br /> sure those concerns will not be resolved until such timethe property is actually developed <br /> because you can only say and promise so many things right leadingup.Ito the actual development <br /> but,he is a very learned individual and he asked mea number of questions about my <br /> interpretation of code, and how certain things apply, and I tried my best fo=answer them. I think <br /> we arrived at where he understood what we were trying to accomplish on theroperty and how <br /> the applicant will be developing it in very responsible manner-and in compliance with <br /> regulations and at no point did he that1zcould remember,_where he actually challenged the <br /> validity or the accuracy of the information thaw provided fo him. He may not necessarily agree, <br /> but I don't think we thought that I was misinterpreting something. So, we left the conversation <br /> in very, very good terms which is why I was pleased to speakto Mr. Carvalho but in the <br /> end, I hope we've addressed-all his concerns <br /> AU: Thank you.REPLOGLEThank you Mr Au == <br /> ROY: Raised hand. <br /> REPLOGLVAYes, Mr. Roy? <br /> ROY: I just wanted_to add that I also talked with Mr. Carvalho and while I didn't speak to him <br /> directly, he left a message after_hespoke to Mr. Arai and said that Mr. Arai had addressed his <br /> concerns and that I didn't=need_to:call him back. So, he seemed like after their conversation and <br /> of course you got the response letter he seemed satisfied with those responses from the applicant. <br /> So, I just wanted to say that Tie did leave a message and said that he was okay and understood the <br /> process and no longer had any major concerns and so that is it. <br /> ARAI: Raised his hand. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Mr. Arai? <br /> ARAI: I just wanted to disclose throughout this process we tried to be as upfront and transparent <br /> as possible in what was being presented to the Commission and the County. The applicant and I <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT A(DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.