COM 0314.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

DARROW: Thanks, Chair Vitousek. So kind of wrapping things up and working on the conditions that we could provide for the commission, I've been kind of texting with Christian. As far as the preservation, it appears that if we just remove Condition M—is it, Christian? KAY: (Nods in the affirmative) DARROW: —which was the option for data recovery, then it would be back to Condition L, which would be focusing on the preservation. You may have to reword that a little bit in the beginning where it says, "Should the applicants choose"; so at this point there is no more choice. The other condition that I mentioned earlier that would basically replace Condition J, which states simply, "`Ohara dwellings, if approved by the Planning Department, shall be serviced by individual water meters as approved by the Department of Water Supply"; so that would take over,that would remove Condition J and then be added. And again, we are aware that they are limited to one additional water unit from the Department of Water Supply, so that basically would be where they are at. Now, again,keeping in mind that in the future if more water comes into the area, then they have the ability to add additional dwellings. Then we had talked about the simple minor changes on Condition C, "application"to "applicant," and Condition N to remove"unlikely." If Christian can reword Condition M, maybe what we can do is take out the one and add in the roadway condition requirements that you are asking for. And then we, it sounds like we should be close. VITOUSEK: Okay, yeah, I'm really,I think that's great, and at this point I would like to move towards a motion and then these can be discussed. Commissioner Van Pernis. VAN PERNIS: Yes, I believe that the applicant has agreed to limit the possibility of`ohana, so did the Planning Department, to Lots 5 and 6, and that should be stated in what the Planning Department has talked about. VITOUSEK: Okay, I think we are getting into discussion, and I would really like to have a main motion on the floor before we get into discussion on the revisions of the conditions. So,would someone like to make a motion to recommend favorable or unfavorable? KAY: Mr. Chair, I'm sorry,before you get started, we have two items on the agenda; I don't know if you want to take the state land use boundary amendment first and then get into the rezone, which seems to be the meat of the condition changes. VITOUSEK: Yeah, I agree, I think that we should move with the amendment to the state land use boundary first, get a motion on that. KAY: Barbara has her hand raised. VITOUSEK: Commissioner DeFranco. 16 DRAFT