My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0314.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0314.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2021 10:37:11 AM
Creation date
7/2/2021 9:18:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0314
Point
001
Author
Jeffrey W. Darrow, Deputy Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2021/07/20 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2021/08/03 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis,hold on <br /> VAN PERNIS: —traffic mitigation— <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, I'm going to call a recess, a short recess, and I'll have a discussion with <br /> Commissioner Van Pernis. Thank you, everybody,please resume in five minutes. <br /> (Chairman Vitousek called a short recess at 12:52 p.m. He called the hearing back to order at <br /> 12:55 p.m.) <br /> VITOUSEK: We are going to be coming back to order. <br /> VAN PERNIS: There is no question that this project will generate traffic on Ka`iminani and on <br /> Mamalahoa. That's why I think all the amendments to the application, which have been referred <br /> to—stop sign, mirror, speed bump, as well as the limitation of`ohana and the water commitment <br /> to Lot 5 and 6—are all appropriate. And I would say that those conditions need to be added to <br /> the approval. I will vote for it, but I'll be holding my nose while I do it. <br /> VITOUSEK: Would you like to make amendments? Would you like to offer a secondary <br /> motion requesting amendments to the— <br /> VAN PERNIS: I'm not clear on what amendments have already been made or have already been <br /> included by the Planning Department. If there are none, then I would make that motion to <br /> amend. <br /> VITOUSEK: So far, there have been no formal amendments that have been made. There are <br /> several suggested amendments. But we've got a motion on the floor to advance a favorable <br /> recommendation. At this point we are not even discussing conditions of the zoning ordinance <br /> because this is the state land use boundary amendment. So once we are taking up the item of the <br /> rezoning, we can do clarifications on conditions. <br /> VAN PERNIS: I will hold off on moving to amend until the next motion. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay,thank you. So, are there any other concerns relating to the state land use <br /> boundary amendment? (No audible response) Okay, seeing none, we'll proceed with roll call. <br /> KAY: Okay, thank you, Mr. Chair. This is for approval as recommended by the deputy <br /> planning director. Commissioner DeFranco—pardon me, a favorable recommendation as <br /> recommended by the deputy planning director—Commissioner DeFranco? <br /> DEFRANCO: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Carr Smith? <br /> CARR SMITH: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Newberg? <br /> 18 <br /> DRAFT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.