Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Hold on, Christian, Christian has a question. <br /> KAY: I'm sorry,just for,just for consistency. The other conditions represent"applicants" as <br /> there are two applicants, so would that be okay to add the "s?" <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay. <br /> KAY: Okay, thank you. <br /> CARR SMITH: Sure, "applicants." Moving through the conditions, we are not going to make <br /> any adjustment to J, so it stays the same. We are going to eliminate paragraph M, as in <br /> "Mom"— <br /> KAY: One more—sorry to interrupt again. <br /> CARR SMITH: Yeah? <br /> KAY: Condition L has a preceding sentence that says, "Should the applicants choose to preserve <br /> the Archaeological Sites in place"— <br /> CARR SMITH: Okay— <br /> KAY: —if we can remove that; I thought I heard the Chair want to remove that and just start <br /> with"prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits." <br /> CARR SMITH: Very good, so in paragraph L, we eliminate the first line with the exception of <br /> "prior,"okay. <br /> KAY: Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: So, Mr. Pipan,you have something you'd like to— <br /> PIPAN: Yes, thank you for the opportunity. Regarding Condition J, the prohibition of <br /> additional dwelling units, we really prefer to keep that as only additional `ohana units would be <br /> permitted on proposed lots 5 and 6 and served by Department of Water Supply meters. <br /> Reasons— <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you, your comments noted. <br /> PIPAN: Okay, thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. <br /> CARR.SMITH: Can I continue with my motion? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> 22 <br /> DRAFT <br />