COM 0332.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CLARKSON: I have one more question on a different item for staff. I've looked several times, but I don't see perhaps maybe someone from staff can point out where the time limits are in the conditions. There's references to time limits but I don't see a condition which actually sets any time limits in the condition. Except the hundred eighty(180) days for the sewer connection so that's fine with me I don't think there should be any time limits but where are they? CAMERO: So, Commissioner Clarkson in situations like these especially along Kino`ole Street where there had been other rezones, we've set time limits as far as like the start of construction shall occur within 5 years and all of these improvements shall be made within those within the 5 years. However, in this case because there is that existing use there what we did was in Condition B we had mentioned at first that a plan approval shall be required prior to change in tenancy that was one of our timing triggers or when there is an establishment of a new land use permitted within the CG zoning district or in addition to an existing structure or development in accordance with our Chapter 25 that was in the original recommendation for Condition B. Condition G also had the prior to change in tenancy wording however,in yesterday's Director's revised recommendation and conditions of approval that were sent via email. The Director is proposing to amend those conditions in removing the change in tenancy requirement in Condition B as well as removing the change in tenancy in Condition G. I CLARKSON: Okay, fair share, so Condition O is about time extensions. An initial extension of time, granting the time extension, the time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance. Where are the time conditions in these in this list of conditions which O refers to? CAMERO: So, O, yes,I understand that question now. As far as the time conditions, the time conditions that were proposing right now for the applicant's because they aren't proposing to change the use, they're not proposing to construct new structures they just want to continue to have this non-conforming use but now really coming into conformance with our Chapter Code. That's why they are really coming in for this change of zone so what we're proposing and the time conditions will really occur later on and the applicant can answer what their plans are for the future: But, right now the only timing that we have is once they decide to change their establishment of a new land use like if they wanted to come in for a drive-through or a possible medical clinic or if they wanted to just evenadd on to some sort of structure or move some sort of structure on the property. Then we would require them to go through and do the water calculations as well as complete the sidewalk requirements. The sewer requirement though that's something that we can't allow for a time extension that is required by Chapter 21-5 and we are proposing in our conditions that 180 days from the effective date of this ordinance they will have to connect to the sewer. CLARKSON: Okay, I understand about Condition J,but, since there aren't any time conditions like you've got to do this within 5 years don't you think that all references to time extensions and triggers for time extensions should be removed except for J? JACKSON: Commissioner Clarkson you are correct. There're no specific time conditions so you're questioning why we have the administrative time extension condition. Correct? i 8 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) I i