COM 0332.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

But the map of the property it shows there is a parking a paved parking area it's not encroaching onto the Lono Street roadway. It does have about four(4) spaces including a handicapped space pursuant to that 1990 plan approval for the Children's Advocacy Center. Also on the property is the enclosed carport not encroaching onto Lono Street either and in front of that exists some parking as well. So, none of that excuse me, none of that encroaches onto Lono Street. So, I hope that answered your question as far as that issue. I did want to also say that that parking is sufficient that applicant is requesting and so what they are requesting is simply to legalize or formalize the use that has been in existence since 1990 under the determination the informal determination by the Planning Department. The reason for that is simply because things change, times change and the lease that's current now is expires in March of twenty twenty-four(2024) and also under that lease there is a provision that with a hundred twenty(12 0) days' notice so just you know a short notice period either tenant or landlord could terminate the lease. So, the applicants simply want the option to figure out what they are going to do to be able to continue that use if that were to happen and could happen. And also, that continuity so the stability and the continuity of knowing that they could continue to use it as it being used now with no expansion. So, same parking,same amount of people coming in and out. They also wanted the ability with the Change of Zane to CG the Commercial zoning 7.5 to provide for greater commercial options under the permitted uses under the zoning code to the surrounding community. So, those uses as you see in the amended conditions of approval. If there was an expansion or change in use those would be the things that would then trigger the water improvements as well as the final plan approval. And my understanding is if that were to occur then also the Lono Street access and whether or not it would accommodate those changes change of use or expansion of use would then be looked at. In fact, there is a requirement if there are going to be a certain amount of trips made that the applicants did a traffic study a traffic analysis at that time. So,just in closing I just want to say I'm really grateful for the Planning Department's favorable recommendations for working with the applicants to establish appropriate conditions. We find the conditions to be reasonable and acceptable to the applicants. We also appreciate the comment from the Commissioner regarding the Condition O we were also a little bit confused by that, but I just figured it was just part of what the Planning Department does so, we have no qualms about removing that condition for the timing. And applicants are able to just let you know they are able and willing to comply with and perform the conditions within that permissible timeline for the sewer connection and based on the stated triggers under B and G for the water and the sidewalk improvements. So, at this time, I'm happy to take questions and Charlene and John as well if you have specific questions for them, they are here and able and willing to answer. Thank you so much for time. REPLOGLE: Thank you very much. Fellow Commissioners do you have any questions for the applicants themselves? Yes, Mr. Clarkson? 11 EXHIBIT B(DRAFT)