COM 0331.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i I 3 CLARKSON: No, that 2, it's just in two parts. I forget the Condition letters one had to do with fair share which would be triggered on final plan approval or final subdivision approval and the other for the 7-year time extension be deleted in its entirety. KERN: Mr. Chair, if I may? REPLOGLE: Yes, you may. KERN: Commissioner Clarkson, I believe the first point for fair share contribution is already in there, fair share contributions is due upon final subdivision approval. So, I believe that that's squared away and as far as your proposed potential amendment there with the time extension I have no issues with that your rationale does makes sense. It's an area of you know it's urban. So, if you guys to that direction,we'll support it. REPLOGLE: Okay, so, Mr. Clarkson are you amending Ms. Galimba's motion? CLARKSON: Correct. I'm in— REPLOGLE: Let's have it. CLARKSON: Well, I — AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Au? AU: As far as Commissioner Clarkson's amendment, can we hear from the applicant and see what their thoughts are on that potential amendment? REPLOGLE: Sure. Mr. Correa, do you have any thoughts or would like to put something in. CORREA III: Well, we certainly in favor of the amendment— CORREA JR.: Son, "—" of course we would be in favor of it but either way we're going to do it within the 7 years, you know, like I mean if something doesn't change drastically between now and the end of the year first of next year our long-term goal is not only to do the twenty-one(2 1) lots but to build out the houses over a period of a year and a half, 2 years maybe, maybe 3 years so, but we'd certainly be in favor of you know of that amendment. REPLOGLE: Thank you. CLARKSON: I'd like to thank the applicants for tolerating my making this session just a little bit longer, but I'd like to continuing to help set a precedent that rezones where possible shouldn't have time limits on them, that's all. 7 EXHIBIT C(DRAFT)