RES 142 Draft 02 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

(1) A simple, clear, general summary of the detailed contents of the capital program. (2) The capital improvements pending or proposed for the ensuing six fiscal years, together with the estimated cost of each improvement and the proposed method of financing it. (3) Such other information as the council or mayor may request."; and WHEREAS, there is a clear distinction that Section 10-6(a) pertains to the capital budget and Section 10-6(b) pertains to the capital program; and WHEREAS, Article VI, Chapter 6, Section 6-6.3(a), of the Charter, states that the director of finance shall "(a)ssist the mayor in the preparation and execution of the operating budget, operating program and capital budget"; and WHEREAS, Article VI, Chapter 7, Section 6-7.2(b)(4), of the Charter, states that the planning director shall "(r)eview the lists of proposed capital improvements contemplated by agencies of the county and recommend the order of their priority"; and WHEREAS, looking back 15 years at the capital budget and capital program provides little guidance on project measures and priorities, except for those tied to compliance or mandates from other authorities or controls; and WHEREAS, the concept of "budgeting for outcomes," developed by authors David Osborne and Peter Hutchinson, also known as priority -based budgeting, looks at desired results across government and encourages thinking beyond program inputs and outputs, focusing on measurable outcomes to determine how well programs and services benefit the public; and WHEREAS, the concept of "condition assessment" is an essential core practice of asset management, which entails an analysis of the condition of infrastructure and would showcase the extent to which County assets are performing, enabling maintenance plans and opportunities for asset optimization; and WHEREAS, the absence of a condition assessment makes it difficult for the County Council and members of the public to fully understand the selection and prioritization of projects in the annual capital budget; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII that Council Member Ashley Kierkiewicz (Chair of the Committee on Planning) and Council Member Susan "Sue" Keohokapu-Lee Loy (Chair of the Committee on Public Works and Mass Transit) are authorized to convene and co-chair a working group to be composed of representatives from the Department of Finance, Planning Department, Department of Public Works, Office of the Corporation Counsel, and Office of the Mayor. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the working group is authorized to develop a condition assessment tool to rate the condition of assets and will submit the rating -tool framework to the County Council prior to the start of the next budget review cycle for fiscal year 2022-2023. 2