Laserfiche WebLink
DocuSign Envelope ID:B2DOC 3EF-E687-4AA6-93CF-D16200518BC6 <br /> 2421 Tax Board of Review Annual Report <br /> 10. The Board encourages the appraisers (when appropriate and at their discretion) to cite <br /> the Hawaii County Code and include it in their board packets to support their decision to <br /> adjust the subject property's values. <br /> 11. The procedure of rendering an immediate decision in open session upon the completion <br /> of the presentation of each appeal case is found to be an acceptable practice to all <br /> parties. Due to the known financial impact of the Board's decision, some cases can be <br /> very emotional for the appellant and at times contentious, however the Board <br /> understands that it is incumbent upon the appellant to provide the data in support of their <br /> claim. <br /> 12. The Board continues to be impressed with how well-prepared the appraisers are. This <br /> has been the case for the past six years. The Board does recommend that the appraisers <br /> completely fill out the appeal data worksheet, especially the County's recommendation of <br /> values located at the bottom of the document. Providing this to the Board for review prior <br /> to hearing the cases has been a vital tool and continues to reduce the amount of time <br /> spent on each case. <br /> 13. The Board has noticed an increased number of cases whereby taxpayers are appealing <br /> RPT's disallowance for the Agricultural Use Program. It is unfortunate to see that some <br /> taxpayers are willing to take advantage of this program that rightfully benefits true <br /> farmers, just to secure a lower tax rate. Due to this, the Board encourages the <br /> enforcement of Rule 31.3 — Petitions to Dedicate; Requirements, specifically Rule 31.3 <br /> (a)(2) from the County of Hawaii, Department of Finance, Rules and Regulations of the <br /> Director of Finance. See attached rule as Exhibit "A". In addition, the Board encourages <br /> the appraisers to continue their inspections and reviews of owners under the Non- <br /> Dedicated / Dedicated Agricultural Use Program. <br /> 14. The Board commends the division for their effort to review the enforcement of the <br /> exemption program by expanding their options to verify the claimant's eligibility and to <br /> understand the owner's possible financial consequences of the disallowance of an <br /> exemption, especially one in the homeowner's classification with the three percent (3%) <br /> growth cap. <br /> 15. The presence of Corporation Counsel, Sinclair Salas-Ferguson at each meeting/hearing <br /> has proven itself to be essential and is recommended to continue. The Board has relied <br /> upon Mr. Salas-Ferguson in many instances for clarification and interpretation of rules <br /> and/or laws. <br /> 16. The presence of the Real Property Administrator and/or Assistant Administrator at each <br /> meeting/hearing has proven itself to be essential and is recommended to continue. The <br /> Board has relied upon the administration in many instances for information on office <br /> policies and procedures before rendering decisions. <br /> 17. The Annual Workshop, which included Real Property Tax staff and board members, held <br /> prior to the start of this year's appeal hearings, was very informative and productive for all <br /> attendees. The continuation of this workshop is highly recommended as it allows the <br /> administrative staff to present a broad array of relevant tax matters and is viewed as an <br /> Hawai`i Coun4,is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 4 <br />