COM 0549.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RAFFIPIY: Okay, all right, thank you. Yeah, that was the one that I was curious about is the right in and right out I wasn't sure there will be a left turn in that area. So, thank you Tracie. REPLOGLE: Are there any further questions for staff? Thank you, Commissioners. So, again Mr. Keith Kato LIN: Chair? REPLOGLE: Oh, yes? LIN: Mr. Clarkson has a— CLARKSON: I just have one more question. REPLOGLE: Please. CLARKSON: This is State land,public land, I just wanted to ask our legal Counsel and perhaps the staff, whether there are any public trust implications in our decision today? � KEKAI: I think, as this is just a boundary change and you're not actually approving a project, I would say no, but I'll go check on that. If you just give me five minutes. You guys can move on with further questions and I'll come back. You can let the applicant speak. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. The third time's a charm, Mr. Kato, and Mr. McComber, have you received the background and recommendations from the Planning Department? KATO: Yes. REPLOGLE: Do you agree with the Planning Director's recommendation, including the proposed conditions? KATO: Yes. REPLOGLE: Okay, go ahead with your presentation. KATO: Well, thank you, Chairman and Commissioners. We've been working on this project for a while, and we believe that it's a very interesting project in that it is really a different kind of project form. Tracie if you could put up the detailed site plan, I think that would help to explain what we're trying to do here. CAMERO: Yes, let me get that up for you. KATO: Sure, so what we're proposing to do is develop this development concept called the pocket neighborhoods. The idea is to take clusters of small structures, either single family duplex maybe triplex structures and group them around the central green areas. You can see that they're kind of ariauged in groups of maybe a dozcm homes, maybe 1owlcen (14) and the idea is 6 EXHIBIT D(DRAFT)