Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Parcel 104 that has the self-storage facility with the other uses, Parcel 103 is here, and it is the <br /> former location of most recently E Komo Mai Lounge. The other parcels are vacant of any <br /> improvements. Here's some views of the subject properties again this is Parcel 104 from <br /> Kalanikoa Street showing the existing self-storage facility, the furniture repair shop is here, and <br /> then the base yard for ambulances and upper right are views from the other parcels from <br /> Kalanikoa Street. Lower left are views of the parcels from the intersection of Kuawa and <br /> Kalanikoa and then the lower right is a view of the parcels from Kuawa Street. Oops, wrong <br /> slide forgot to take that one out. With all that said,the Director is recommending that the <br /> Commission forward a favorable recommendation to the County Council to repeal Ordinance 97 <br /> 106. With that I'd like to turn the time back over to the Chair,thank you for your time. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you, Christian. We will now hear from Ronald Kim Esq., Agent for the <br /> Applicant. Please raise your right hand. So, I can swear you in. Do you swear or affirm to tell <br /> the truth on this matter now before the Windward Planning Commission? <br /> KIM: Yes, I do. <br /> REPLOGLE: Please state your name and the town you live in, and have you received the <br /> background and recommendation from the Planning Department? <br /> KIM: Good morning, Chairperson. Ronald Kim, I live in Hilo and yes, I have received the j <br /> background report and recommendations from the Planning Department, thank you. <br /> i <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, do you agree with the Planning Director's recommendations including <br /> proposed conditions? <br /> KIM: Yes, we do yes. <br /> REPLOGLE: Please go ahead with your presentation. <br /> KIM: Okay, we have very little to add actually to what the Planning Department already did. <br /> The Planning Department did a really good job of explaining the background and situation. And <br /> what the plan is for the property, what the difference is between the two zoning designations. <br /> Where it's really sort of a distinction without a difference as far as Chaqueaux and their neighbor <br /> goes,because both of their uses would be allowed under either Limited Industrial or the Mixed <br /> Commercial Industrial Use. So, it really does seem like a logical step, and it does put us in <br /> compliance with the law to allow Chaqueaux to go forward with getting plan approval, if we <br /> revert those zoning back to the initial Limited Industrial. We're happy to respond to any <br /> questions you might have about the property or Chaqueaux. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you, Mr. Kim. Commissioners do you have any questions for the staff or <br /> the applicant? Mr. Clarkson? <br /> I <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question for the staff. The difference in zoning between the two, as <br /> far as, I mean there were literally dozens of uses approved for each zoning designation and I <br /> didn't go through them one by one. But I wanted to ask the Planning Department staff whether <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT C(DRAFT) <br />