My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0550.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0550.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2021 2:51:24 PM
Creation date
12/10/2021 2:52:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0550
Point
001
Author
Jeffrey Darrow for Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/01/05 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Since they both seem to need an ordinance amendment and one is a reversion one <br /> is dropping of the time conditions. Why and I bring this up because this issue of the <br /> unworkability of time conditions has come up over and over again, while I've been on the <br /> Commission. My preference is that these rezone ordinances be enacted without any of these <br /> time conditions basically if it makes sense to rezone it makes sense to rezone forever or until <br /> there's a change in the neighborhood. So, I'm just curious why the Planning Department said <br /> yeah you can't do anything because of these expired time conditions. Why don't you asked to <br /> revert to a previous zoning rather than why don't you ask to have the time conditions dropped? <br /> KAY: I think the process that we were responding to was the applicant's requests. I personally <br /> hadn't thought of just dropping those conditions. So that's where we're at. It wasn't at the <br /> request of the Department to go ahead and do this initiation we're just responding to <br /> Chaqueaux's request. <br /> CLARKSON: Okay, that explains it, thank you. I thought that it was a suggestion from an <br /> initiation from the Department to take the course you took. I'm sorry. <br /> KAY: No worries. Mr. Kim has his hand up. <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Kim? <br /> KIM: Thank you,just as a further on the conditions, the ordinance was enacted in 1997, and so <br /> the conditions were imposed over 20 years ago. So, that was another thing we were thinking too, <br /> is that the situation on the ground today is probably not going to be the same as it was in 1997. <br /> Z� <br /> So, we thought it'd be cleaner to go back and just revert the zoning. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Any other questions? So, I'll— <br /> GALIMBA: I'd like to make a motion. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> GALIMBA: I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the <br /> repeal of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 97 106,based on the Planning Director's <br /> recommendations, which shall be adopted. <br /> AGUINALDO: I second. <br /> REPLOGLE: It's been moved and seconded by Commissioner Galimba and Commissioner <br /> Aguinaldo. Would staff do the roll call vote,please. <br /> KAY: Sure, is there any discussion before that happens? <br /> REPLOGLE: Oh, any discussion? Thank you about doing it this way. No discussion. Mr. <br /> Kay? <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT C(DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.