COM 0572.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i I REPLOGLE: Yes. AU: Okay, so this question actually can go to all three testifiers. In the background report that i we received. I'm looking at a letter from the Association. By any chance, are any of you 3 testifiers are you part of the Association? HAWK: I am. Aubrey Hawk, I'm Secretary of the Volcano Community Association (VCA). AU: Okay, well that's all I wanted to know and I'm assuming that the applicant is going to address the meetings and some of the things that say it. But if you want Ms. Hawk, if you can just kind of briefly, really short you don't have to go on about it-just give us the gist of how the Association meetings went from your standpoint. HAWK: We had one meeting which the Association had hosted and Mr. Arai and Mr. Fuke who are consultants for the developer were there in person. The developer was there via Zoom, albeit with a bad connection. Several other community members were there via Zoom and about ten (10) of us VCA board members and neighbors and community members were there in person. It was a bit of a chaotic meeting. It was designed just to sort of be a dialogue building, let's just talk story and share what it is we want to do. But the bottom line is we are opposed to rezoning from residential to commercial for the purpose of bringing in any type of vacation, lodging, hotel, motel facility. We as a community believe that the County law that was just recently passed. It actually caused a lot of longtime residents whose livelihood was to operate small B &B's and little STVR's on their property to have to relinquish that income. Even though there was no complaint from the community, because of permitting or just the various things that allowed them that would have allowed them to maintain and be grandfathered in. Now we see an outside nonresident developer with absolutely no connection to Hawaii,let alone to Volcano Village looking to kind of get around that law because they've been able to pay the right people and bring in another STVR. Which we've all agreed,we simply do not need in Volcano Village. There are hundreds of opportunities and places for people to stay. So that was kind of what the VCA, that's where our position stems from. Then secondarily, we are very concerned with larger clear cutting type developments on this particular lot, which is relatively very thickly forested on that whole Old Volcano Road that could potentially be converted to commercial that's probably actually the most forested lot. So those are some really old `6hi`a trees and hapu`u ferns that are in there. Once those are gone, they are gone, and we have determined, the Puna Community has determined that it's very important to maintain that canopy so that our native birds can do their overflights upcountry. So that was the secondary point of the VCA on this project. There's just no way around those 2 points. No matter how they keep trying to tweak it or call it a hosted or say oh we are going to preserve the trees. We know that the plans that they have don't have to be adhered to once this commercial zoning would be approved. Does that answer it for you? 6 EXHIBIT A (DRAFT)