My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0601.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0601.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 12:36:14 PM
Creation date
1/21/2022 4:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0601
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/02/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2022/02/22 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2022/03/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
conceptual preservation plan map to show potential treatment for those three sites as well as <br /> conceptual linkages between the sites as requested by Ala Kahakai and Na Ala Hele. <br /> CAMERO: The applicant did a view-plane study for the project and was able to provide us with <br /> the following photos that you will see on your screen. On this screen you have the site photos of <br /> the project area from the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway facing makai. The top photo is the <br /> current view and the bottom photo is the proposed, is the view with the proposed Kumu Hou <br /> project. To minimize the visual impacts, the applicant is proposing to restrict the height of the <br /> structures. There will also be careful selection and placement of landscaping, as well as <br /> developing structures with earth-toned and non-reflective materials. <br /> As we discussed earlier, the LUC decision and order for the project which mandates an 800-foot <br /> no building buffer from the highway is located within this general vicinity that I'm circling with <br /> my laser pointer and will require the installation of underground utilities. <br /> This slide is showing you the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway at its southern-most intersection with <br /> Waikoloa Beach Drive. Again, the top photo is the current conditions at the intersection, and the <br /> lower photo is the indication of the vantage point that is looking into the project area and shows <br /> you, if you can see it, what the proposed Kumu Hou project will look like with the proposed <br /> timeshare units within"Area B"that are these photos right there. <br /> Lastly, this is a site photo facing north on Waikoloa Beach Drive at its southern-most <br /> intersection with Ala Ihi Way. The top photo, again, shows you the existing conditions, and the <br /> lower photo is the indication of what the new landscaping plans will look like as well as the <br /> pedestrian paths that Christian mentioned in his earlier slides that will essentially connect the <br /> Kumu Hou project to the existing resort. <br /> At this time the Director is recommending approval of the amendments to SMA 25, as well as <br /> the approval of the SMA Use Permits PL-SMA-2021-000002, 2021-000003, 2021-000004, and a <br /> favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council for PL-REZ-2021-000004 as <br /> well as PL-REZ-2021-000005. <br /> After receiving the Planning Director's recommendation for the Change of Zone for"Area A", <br /> the applicant requested an amendment be made to Condition D of REZ-2021-000004 to read as <br /> follows and to add the plus or minus to Condition D that you can see on your screen. According <br /> to the applicant, the reason for this request is that the 12.8 acres is conceptual, and the actual <br /> amount will be established when more detail planning area occurs. We wanted to just make a <br /> note that after the Commission received the November 5th background report, the Department <br /> received an additional 176 letters in support of the Kumu Hou project, as well as four letters of <br /> public testimony against the project that the commissioners should have received. <br /> Some of the next steps, should the commission vote to forward a favorable recommendation for <br /> the two change of zones will need to go before the County Council. There's specific conditions <br /> in the new SMA permits that will make the effectivedate of the three new SMA permits the <br /> same effective date as the change of zones. <br /> That concludes our presentation, and we can turn it over to the Chair. <br /> 12 <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.