|
address police and fire because they're kind of like not specifically all attributable to one project
<br /> but they're kind of like more like a group type. And to necessarily assign one person or one
<br /> project, you know to, to bear to tab for the rest of the community may not be fair, and hence the
<br /> idea behind a fair share came about. Likewise, for recreation and roads and traffic
<br /> So, I don't have a specific answer to your question,because other than beyond providing the
<br /> capital improvements, you do have long term operating expenses that only the County Council
<br /> administration is going to have to decide on like how much to allocate, so. It's different, like if
<br /> you go to Japan, you know you have by the system of like Koban. You know,they're kind of like
<br /> almost like every other area, every other block. But you know that system of police security is
<br /> not available, so the only other option, I would imagine would be like for the respective areas to
<br /> have their own,hire their own security.
<br /> VITOUSEK: Got it.
<br /> KERN: I'd like to real quickly add that there is a police substation at the Mauna Lani fire station
<br /> as well, in the general approximate area.
<br /> FUKE: Oh, thank you.
<br /> VITOUSEK: So, with that, in our background reports it's not indicated. I'm just curious, is it,
<br /> you know the,the adequacy, is that, have we had any discussion with any of the County Police
<br /> Department? See if it's adequate, if there's anything that we can do? I mean,just for me, looking
<br /> at it where we've got to make these fair share contributions anyway, and if they do something
<br /> concrete like adding to the existing substation or doing something like, that they can minus that
<br /> away from their fair share contribution costs. It can be deducted and then we get something
<br /> physical done that helps the whole community and helps them with their response and doesn't,
<br /> doesn't lighten their wallet any more than fair share contributions would. Just curious if that's
<br /> something that was looked at.
<br /> PLUNKETT: Maybe I could interject a little bit if--first of all, you know, certainly we don't
<br /> have any objection because we're bound by it, you know, on the fair share contributions and I'm
<br /> not sure I, I understand the specific request or discussion if the idea is that we could find a
<br /> location for an additional substation that might shorten response times and get credits on fair
<br /> share contributions. That's something developers can always entertain and potentially do. I'm
<br /> just, I can't tell you that that's a need, or that that's something that, you know, should be required
<br /> at this point. I, that's something we haven't actually pursued,but you know those type of
<br /> discussions are things that you know developers, we can always pursue. And I've done it in other
<br /> projects we've been involved in whereby that we build certain facilities like that and get credits
<br /> against certain fair share contributions in exchange. So that, you know, to help, to help those,
<br /> those come along. But again, I'm not sure I understand the specific request, but we would
<br /> certainly entertain those things.
<br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah, you got it correct. Is that, is that what we're looking at. What I'm asking is if
<br /> that was something that was ever considered. If there was consultation with the police
<br /> 41
<br /> EXHIBIT D
<br />
|