COM 0601.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

of your analysis. What you think you can do, and when you think you can do it, so that we can review that and make a recommendation. Commissioner Armbruster. ARMBRUSTER: Hi. So,just a question about that. Would it be reasonable to ask and expect that the Workforce Housing would be constructed before any certificate of occupancy are issued for the main project? Is there a timeline that seems like it could be reasonable? FUKE: That, that's something, Commissioner Armbruster, that's something that can be worked on. You know they, the, there was a lot of discussion between Stanford as well as the landowner in terms of the delivery and you know a number couldn't just, a date, specific date couldn't come up,but hearing what the Commission is suggesting, would the Commission consider something like recommending a condition, you know,relating to the Workforce Housing issue? And I have a language that I would be very easy, easily be willing to share with you that has been vetted and approved by the landowner as well as had been preliminary vetted with the Planning Department. The only thing that's absent is a specific construction timetable with what some of you are asking about so if the Commission recommends the approval on the project district with this condition and you can put a rider on, you know, a transmittal to the Council that the Council seriously consider establishing a construction deadline or something to that effect, and it gives us a chance to between now and the Council's deliberation on this issue to work together with Housing and the developer,the potential developer and being able to establish that kind of deadline. And ideally if we could kind of like agree to what Commissioner Armbruster had suggested, I think that would be the ideal. Prior to issuances of occupancy permit for any of the major projects in that area, I think that would be the ideal. Whether that can be delivered remains to be seen, and for that we just need a little bit time to identify that. So, you're coming, you're being proactive and making, incorporating this Workforce Housing condition with that caveat to the Council that please consider timetable. You know, I'm,that's what I guess we're asking you because I guess from the landowner's standpoint,we kind want to move this on. You know, the quicker the better,because once it gets through,then we can start negotiating with a Council and we know where we stand. And everybody is, knows the importance of the Workforce Housing and the faster we can at least have the basic project that enables this Workforce Housing to go through,the faster it is. You know, and I don't know whether we can do that in December,but I know that the earliest that Council could consider this application would be in January, or late January, or February. So, that'll give us at least a 45- or 60-day window within which to specifically address that issue and come up with a specific language. VITOUSEK: So, once again, as was stated earlier, the Workforce Housing is not tied to this permit so, there's nothing that prevents you from working on-- [Indiscernible audio.] FUKE: Mr. Chair, can you repeat that my--I lost my, I lost my voice. 52 EXHIBIT D