|
feel comfortable trying to go forward with this, because I think they do have a track record. I
<br /> think they are trying to come forward with a reasonable plan for us to look at considering what
<br /> you're asking them to continue to look at, which I think are all very valid points that we've
<br /> brought up today. And I think I was just a little bit frustrated because we've had so much
<br /> discussion without a motion. So, where are we Mike?
<br /> VITOUSEK: Right now we're information fact finding. We do need a, gonna need a motion at
<br /> some point. Anyone's welcome to make one.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Great. Then I'll make a motion then to approve this with,but I don't have the
<br /> language because we've added these'conditions that have to be met or question in the next 40-to
<br /> 60-days. So, I'm not sure how to do this. And there's so many motions. There's—
<br /> SCHLUETER: If I can help at all, Barbara, so if we if we go in order which you folks can
<br /> choose to call each the agenda items as it makes sense to get these out. So, we've got the four
<br /> different SMA Permit applications that, you know, that agenda item 3, 4, 5 and 6, and those you
<br /> folks will be making a decision on. And then it's 7 and 8, that are the rezone, excuse me, did I go
<br /> out of order? I apologize, I did. So, 3, 4, 6, and 7 are the SMA-related, and then 5 and 8 are your
<br /> rezones which will be the recommendations. So, I don't know if you want to take them—do a
<br /> motion one by one, or,because we'll need a motion on each item, on each permit. A motion and
<br /> a decision on each permit.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. Well, so then the, the first motion would be on three? Is that correct?And I
<br /> would be--go ahead.
<br /> SCHLUETER: Yeah. I think, if it makes sense to everybody else we can start with, we can go
<br /> agenda item by agenda item.
<br /> DEFRANCO: And then we make the, we make this with the idea then we have a discussion. Is
<br /> that right?
<br /> SCHLUETER: That's correct. I know that this is kind of hard because everything's kind of been
<br /> looked at in a global,but we were going to need--if we want to go ahead with agenda item 3,
<br /> then make a motion on 3--
<br /> KERN: Point of order. We'd actually want to do 4, 5, and 6. If those are approved, we come
<br /> back and do 3 because 3 amends the master SMA 25, which then you would remove, which
<br /> would still be in effect. You'd only remove that if the others were approved.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, so would I would want to—
<br /> KERN: Make sense, Delilah?
<br /> SCHLUETER: Yeah. So, that's 4, 6—agenda items 4, 6, and 7. So, we'll do 4, 6, 7, 3, and then 5
<br /> and 8 are your rezones. So--
<br /> 54
<br /> EXHIBIT D
<br />
|