COM 0601.001 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

effort that went into that is terrific. And I think that that same level of effort can be extended to our Commission who is tasked with making the decision on issuing these permits. And so, for us to digest thousands of pages of information within a week or so, and to provide questions, I think it's reasonable for us to request an additional month to have the questions that we've posed analyzed, and answered, and come back to us with more concrete information. And I think delaying the project by a month won't mean anything in the long term,but making the right decisions and having the right information will make a big difference in the long term. So I, I would be in support of deferring. VITOUSEK: Mr. Fuke. FUKE: Mr. Chairman, I realized that you're already in the motion mode and maybe not in a position to accept any statements from the applicant, but.I've had a chance previously to discuss it with the applicant and if the Commission wants to defer it for the limited purpose of getting more information on three items that their staff, Maija had raised. Specifically in terms of the connectivity, the issue dealing with police and fire, maybe consolidation, and third dealing with the establishing a construction timetable on the workforce housing. If you want to have that meeting considered at your next meeting in December, then the applicant would have no objections to it. But,just understand that they kind of wanted to move on,but if that's you know, in deference to what you're saying and we can appreciate the need for wanting to get all of these information before making a reasoned decision. The applicant is willing to have the matter • continued until your next meeting. VITOUSEK: Thank you very much. I definitely appreciate that consideration. It will be up to the Commissioners to decide,but I feel like when you start a project isn't what truly matters, but when you finish, and I think getting the right groundwork will help us help everybody finish the project in a better way. That's my opinion and I'd love to hear from my fellow Commissioners. Commissioner DeFranco. DEFRANCO: I have, I have no problem deferring. I understand exactly what you're saying, Mike. I pushed the motion because we have to be able to talk about it. So, I'm, I'm open to your consideration and everybody's consideration. I think the hard part for me is that we're going to lose Shani. She's not going to be here and I value her mana`o a lot,because of her background and expertise, so. VITOUSEK: Such is the nature of loss. We're sorry to lose you, Shani. Anybody else have any—Commissioner Yates? YATES: I just wanna. I agree with what Barbara has to say. Yes, Shani, we shall miss you. Even though you've been here, you know, good luck in all that you do ARMBRUSTER: Thank you, thank you very much. 58 EXHIBIT D