|
BOEDEKKER: Scott, do you want to answer that?
<br /> HEAD: Yeah, I can answer that. At one time when we owned and managed Queen's
<br /> Marketplace, that was something that we actually sought, and there has been a great deal of
<br /> interest to have an urgent care center within our master plan community. We do have doctors
<br /> that provide mobile services that provide services through for, for our visitors and locals alike
<br /> that are that are here and staying on premises,but for the most part, if we need care services,
<br /> there are providers up in Waikoloa Village and, and obviously up in Waimea as well.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Are you, are you still pursu--pursuing the idea of an urgent care center at the
<br /> marketplace?The Queen's Marketplace?
<br /> HEAD: Yeah,we,we have office space that's conducive to that. When I say we, Alexander and
<br /> Baldwin does. They have they have vacancy, and I know that they're probably most likely
<br /> continuing those offers—those,pursuing those types of offers. But I'm not sure, I couldn't give
<br /> you a definitive status as to where it,where it is resides right now.
<br /> DEFRANCO: Thank you.
<br /> VITOUSEK: You have any more questions Commissioner DeFranco?
<br /> I got some questions. I guess the first question, I would really appreciate it if there's any way we
<br /> can do a rundown of what units are allowed under the current LUC ruling and the SMA 25, and
<br /> what have already been built and what's,what's remaining that can be built under that current
<br /> unit count. I think I had it written down from staff's presentation. Three thousand hotel units and
<br /> 3,365 residential units.
<br /> FUKE: Commissioner Vitousek, I, I did the number and, I won't,my math is kind of like still at
<br /> kindergarten level, so if it's like some error excuse myself, maybe others can correct me,but the
<br /> math that I had as like I'm looking at it. In 1978 when the SMA permit was approved, it had
<br /> considerations for total of 6,430 units here between multiple-family.and hotel units. When it was
<br /> amended, which back in 1978 that 6,430 unit was all concentrated on the makai side of the trail,
<br /> and when in 1991 when the,the, you know, subject area, was rezoned and a new SMA was
<br /> amended, then that density was reduced from 6,430 to 6,365. So, currently right now I think
<br /> you'd be looking at the 6,365 cap.
<br /> The--I don't know how many of these have actually been developed,but maybe Scott can answer
<br /> that because there are like a number of properties that were scheduled for development based
<br /> upon whatever the zoning density would have allowed, but they didn't materialize. A good
<br /> example is Naupaka Place which is zoned resort and it turned out to be a Single-Family
<br /> Residential lot. So, the amount of projected density in that area, you know, back in 1978 or in
<br /> 1991 did not materialize. So, as a practical matter the, the total number of really developable area
<br /> is significantly less than what is allocated. So, but I think I'll turn it over to Scott because, as I
<br /> say, my math is not that good.
<br /> HEAD: Go ahead, Ann.
<br /> 31
<br /> EXHIBIT D
<br />
|