COM 0829.000 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SUZAN,E D.CASE 2 CITAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE r� "q yyBOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURC:H GOVER`tOROFELAWAII C'ot,ITIISSiON ON WATER RESOURCE MA NAGRIIENC f- ' r1 ROBERT K MASLDA. S, FWSTDEP= C�QS 06 and Ndr4d i cx yc f6 + - AL ICALEO ALA NEL DEPUlI DUD(IOR-R:ATBR AQUA=RESOLRCES BOATING ADD OCEAN RECREATION W` BUREAU OF CONIDYANCES C'O'_. f[SSJON OF WATER RESOURCE M.kL AGEM T C'ON'SERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS STATE OF HAWAII C.2SER�ATION AND RESOURCES ENTORCTNMhZ ■1 ENGIt.'FEftRiC FORESTRY ANP W(LDL(FE Stare ofN a'i DEPARTIV�NT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES RAHooLA ISL.�Na IS SE R R COMMISSION LAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE PARKS KAKUI-III-IEWA BUILDING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,STE 555 KAPOLEL HAWAII 96707 March 4,2022 IN REPLY REFER TO: Zendo Kern,Director Project No.2022PR00192 County of Hawaii,Planning Department Doc.No.2203SN03 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo,HI 96720 planning(o,hawaiicounty.gov Dear Mr,Kern: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review Change of Zone Amendment Application No.PL-REZ-2022-000015 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No.06 82(REZ 05-000027) Applicant: Clinton Hinchcliff Kaloko Ahupua`a,North Kona District,Island of Hawaii TMK: (3)7-3-024: 008 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's(SHPD's)review of the request for an amendment to a County of HawaiiChange of Zone Ordinance No_06 82 (REZ 05-000027)by the applicant Clinton Hinchcliff for a 5- year Time Extension of Condition D (Time to Complete Construction), Amend Conditions E, F and Delete Condition J. The project application(PL-REZ-2022-000015)was received by our office on February 14, 2022.The submittal included a memo to agencies,County of Hawaii Rezoning Time Extension Request,and a site plan. Project Description The applicant, Clinton Hinchcliff(landowner), is requesting a time extension, retroactive to June 2016 and for an additional five (5)years from the effective date of the rezoning amendment.with the possibility of an administrative extension. The Applicant is also requesting the deletion of Condition J relating to the prohibition of a building permit and some technical amendments to Conditions E, F, and G relating to the necessity of a recorded agreement prior to receipt of final subdivision approval, Findings The submittal indicates that the project area has not been subject to any archaeological inventory surveys (AIS). Additionally, the submittal indicates that a survey (?1971) was conducted for the adjacent Kaloko Mauka Subdivision and that no historic properties were identified. The application indicates that based on the findings of this report, COH staff recommended the approval of the rezoning(Item E)based on the absence of findings for the adjacent parcel in the 1971 report. However,due to the age of the report,the report does not meet current standards for archaeological survey work and is outside the current project area. Item K of the current application states that the applicant will comply with the ceasing of work if unanticipated archaeological remains are discovered. Additionally,the application indicates that a request for a determination was submitted in 2006 but correspondence was not found. Based on current information, this does not provide sufficient mitigation based on the absence of archaeological findings within the current project area. Determination Based on the information provided above,the SHPD has no objections to the requested time extension. However, SBTD has insufficient information to determine the potential of the any future development within the current project area to impact historic properties on parcel 008.Therefore, SHPD requests an opportunity to review any future permits involving ground disturbing activities related to proposed development of the subject parcel and