Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> alternative but, I believe it's safer for the whole subdivision to take that approach in moving the <br /> entrance. So, I just wanted your opinion. Thank you Chair. <br /> LIN: Thank you Commissioner De Luz. Thank you, Mr. Doi. <br /> DOI: That's all? <br /> LIN: Thank you. <br /> DOI: Okay, thank you. <br /> LIN: Applicant or the applicant representative, did you have any further comments or remarks? <br /> YEH: My understanding on the history of what Mr. Doi is talking about is he asked if there was <br /> a willingness to acquire his property. I'm not sure what discussions went further than that. But <br /> really, seriously at this time the applicant has enough on its hands in terms of developing what's <br /> there. There may come a time that there's a need to obtain additional property. There's already <br /> been a give so to speak because there is a lot that's going to get conveyed. But other than that, <br /> we're board good on the issues otherwise. Thank you. <br /> AGUINALDO: Mr. Chair, I have a question for the applicant and the representative? <br /> LIN: Go ahead, Commissioner Aguinaldo. <br /> AGUINALDO: Just because of Russell. Do you guys have whatever access or easement or <br /> whatever his pre-existing driveway is right now. And I remember like what Mr. De Luz was <br /> indicating is for his safety. Do you guys have a drawing, is it on your guys site plan Al for his <br /> access relocation. How he's going to get in and out of his property? <br /> YEH: Yes. That's on Exhibit 1, it shows that— <br /> AGUINALDO: Exhibit 1. <br /> YEH: — access. <br /> JACKSON: We'll pull that up. <br /> AGUINALDO: Okay, yeah. Thank you. <br /> YEH: It should be Exhibit 1 to the Background Report. So, using, excuse, using the pointer. <br /> This is the current access to Mr. Doi's property here. As you can see the location is very close to <br /> the intersection so when you have people coming right in particularly it's not a good, safe <br /> alternative. So,the proposed traffic access or easement access would be shifted to this area and <br /> come out over here. That's where the new access would be. So, obviously from a design and <br /> safety standpoint given the kind of traffic that is going to be generated it's not going to be <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />