My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 1:06:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2022 1:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0952
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/09/06 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2022/10/18 (2020-2022)
(Original Version)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANDREWS: Thank you, Chair. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> DEFRANCO: So, further discussion, are we— <br /> VITOUSEK: How is everybody feeling on, on proposing conditions for requiring the <br /> construction of sewer within this project area. Is that something that we want to advocate <br /> for now, or is that something that we're going to punt to the County Council? <br /> KANUHA: I think the Council should take it up. <br /> DEFRANCO: I do, too. <br /> KNOWLES: I agree with Kanuha. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Okay. Well, the County Council will have a record of our <br /> discussion, so they will hear that, and they can make that determination. So, at this point I <br /> think we're okay with moving forward with the roll call vote for the primary motion. <br /> ANDREWS: Okay and let me just verify that I have recorded what this motion is. <br /> Because originally it was a favorable recommendation to County Council, but— <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. <br /> ANDREWS: --should I also—Malia this is a question for you, should I include in this <br /> motion that it also included amendments into the conditions? <br /> HALL: [inaudible] To the amendments-- <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes. <br /> [Unintelligible crosstalk.] <br /> HALL: --previous motion, yeah. <br /> VITOUSEK: The previous motion amended the motion on the floor. So, we can just take <br /> the— <br /> ANDREWS: Put it all into this one single motion. <br /> KANUHA: Yes. <br /> 33 <br /> EXHIBIT F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.