My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0973.000 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0973.000 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2023 1:59:13 PM
Creation date
9/2/2022 11:38:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0973
Point
000
Author
Mitchell D. Roth, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2022-10-19 2020-2022
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2022-11-02 2020-2022
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Council
AGE PC 2022/10/05 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 207 Draft 01 2020-2022
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2020-2022
REP PC 079 2022/10/05 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Mitigative Measures <br /> The Applicant intends to provide any required on-site infrastructure in <br /> conjunction with the development of this project. These will include <br /> on-site drainage system, landscaping, water, and roadway <br /> improvements. All of these will be done in conjunction with the <br /> permitting and permit implementation phases of this project. <br /> Although there should be no residual archaeological or cultural <br /> features on the site, any inadvertent discoveries would be subject to <br /> the SHPD protocols. <br /> D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br /> 1. No Project <br /> Under the status quo alternative, the site would remain in its <br /> present vacant, vegetative use. <br /> Under this scenario, the site would not be utilized to its highest and <br /> best use and much needed housing opportunities would be <br /> curtailed in the very heart of Honoka'a Town. That would be <br /> inconsistent with the visions sought by the General Plan and <br /> Hamakua CDP. <br /> 2. Development Based on Existing RS-10 Zoning <br /> Under this alternative, the area of the requested zoning could still <br /> be developed into 60 or more lots. However, the infrastructure cost <br /> would make it less feasible to market some of them at "affordable" <br /> levels. <br /> 3. Alternative Rezoning <br /> Another option could be to utilize this site for multiple-family or <br /> commercial uses. While that would still be consistent with the <br /> General LUPAG's map Medium Density designation, commercial <br /> uses within a growing residential area and the traffic pattern may <br /> not be appropriate. Additionally, given the existing single-family <br /> residential pattern in this area, multiple family (unless of a less <br /> density) may not be appropriate. <br /> 4. Evaluation of Alternatives <br /> 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.