Laserfiche WebLink
Mark Van Pernis <br /> 4.Applicant/developers often apply for up-zoning and subdivision wth no intention whatsoever to develop, and no <br /> financial capability to do so. They apply so that the conditions and contributions other proposed development will get <br /> set, ONLY BASED AT THE TIME APPLICATION IS MADE! The applicant/developer implies or misrepresents it's going to <br /> develop in the time the ordinance will state(e.g. 5 years). But that can be knowing misrepresentation. Five to fifteen <br /> year extensions/delays are then obtained from the PD, and then further extensions and delays are sought fromthe <br /> •LPC. All these delays are obtained without public review and upgrading of the conditions/infrastructure/affordable <br /> housing. There are ten to twenty thousand approved residential units unbuilt, many with affordable housing <br /> components. <br /> 5. Requiring the ordinance maker, here the CC,to consider and act on any amendments or extension of an ordinance, is <br /> modern land planning,from New York City to San Luis Obispo. <br /> 6. Public confidence in land planning would be greatly increased if the present broken system,which is tipped in the <br /> applicant's developer's favor, is replaced with this modern and responsive system. <br /> 7.The possibilities of corruption would be reduced or eliminated. <br /> 8.A huge number of matters coming before the LPC are requests for time extensions,without any additional <br /> conditions/infrastructure/affordab and housing arising because of the lengthy delays. Very often,the delays are just for, <br /> more time to find a buyer for the approved project and to facilitate a sale.The Commissions Bill <br /> 3 <br />