COM 0898.012 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Finally, the Director's recommendation,the Planning Director recommends that the Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation of Bill 194 to the County Council. And with that, I'll hand the Chair, the floor back to the Chair. VITOUSEK: Mahalo. And we have with us Councilmember Holeka Inaba. Step forward. Right on. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on the matter before the Planning Commission? INABA: I do. VITOUSEK: Mahalo_ Please proceed with your presentation. INABA: Aloha kakahiaka, Chair Vitousek, Vice Chair DeFranco, Members of the Leeward Planning Commission. We are here today discussing Bill 194, which I introduced. As part of the process, we hear it first in the Planning Committee of the County Council, and then it's referred to both Planning Commissions, or to the Department, Planning Commissions, and then back to us, so we can get your folks' input on this legislation, any legislation affecting this part of the Code. So,two weeks ago I presented the same bill to the Windward Planning Commission who, as you know, forwarded a positive recommendation on the matter. And what we have here before us is really this idea of increasing transparency and accountability—transparency perhaps on the County side, accountability on applicants and developers who come before you folks and the County Council, seeking rezoning. So oftentimes for smaller rezoning projects, we are going to see a five-year time frame for subdivision approval or completion of all conditions of approval within a rezoning ordinance. They could be longer depending if it's a big project. But what we see right now—and this is not a practice just of the current Planning Department but one that goes back 40 years—is insertion of language within each rezoning bill that grants the authority to the Planning Director to grant an administrative extension of time, and that's pending, you know, whether it's unforeseen circumstances,there is a criteria within the Department that the Department uses to that whether or not they want to grant the administrative extension. What is being attempted here is to not allow that language to be inserted into bills anymore. If an applicant comes before you folks and before the Council and is agreeing to complete conditions within a certain amount of time, we look back at the ordinance, we should be able to know if it says five years from today, that five years from today, conditions are complete. We currently don't get reports, and it's not required that reports be submitted to you folks, to the Council, letting us know which projects received administrative extensions, but those extensions are granted. And it kind of puts us in a funky place, when you look at ordinances, whether they are technically stale—and I think we are going to have a conversation about stale ordinances—or if the Department did in fact grant. We are currently having internal communication with Corporation Counsel as well, because in some instances we've found that it's been the practice that administrative extensions are being granted after the five-year period has already actually come to an end. So, it's really to clean things up. And I've had good conversation with Planning staff, Corporation Counsel. 3 EXHIBIT G (DRAFT)