Laserfiche WebLink
reasonable amount of time and come to this process when you are ready to commit to completing <br /> conditions. If you are not ready and you know that the Department is recommending seven years <br /> or it's going to take seven years, then don't come here and waste your time and waste our time; <br /> only come when you are ready and you understand and you know what it's going to take. Not <br /> everyone knows what it's going to take, though, is my point. So, if somebody does need seven, <br /> then give them seven,but we are not going to—it's irresponsible to just go and give everybody 10 <br /> now instead of five. So, I don't, I don't support that idea that everybody would get 10 now. It's <br /> look at the project, give a reasonable amount of time. Technically, an applicant is committing to <br /> meet whatever time frame is in as in the bill. The fact that some people bank on getting an <br /> administrative extension later for whatever reason they are going to tell the Department, not sure, <br /> not sure that's in the best interest of our community. And, let's see— <br /> KANUHA: [Inaudible] <br /> VITOUSEK: Commissioner Kanuha. <br /> INABA: —I think that's all I'll say right now. I can answer any questions you folks may have. <br /> DEFRANCO: Mike, I have a question— <br /> KANUHA: Mr. Childs brought up a great point that, you know, I thought about after, which more <br /> or less banking, but if we do have kind of what you guys discussed, if there's an illness or <br /> something and they do have approval, is there going to be a part of their, is there language that is <br /> able to help people with the right interest on their rezone, you know what I mean? It's hard to <br /> speculate what is what because you can say,just like you said, you can say whatever you want to <br /> say to be able to get that. But,you know, with people good-hearted and true-natured, you know, <br /> that are here for the community for the better, the betterment, I would say. [Mr. Van Pernis.from <br /> the audience asked,for the volume to be higher.] Can you hear me better? <br /> VAN PERNIS [in the audience]: Now. <br /> VITOUSEK: Mine is pretty loud. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes. <br /> INABA: Commissioner Kanuha, I'd like to respond, if I may. <br /> KANUHA: Yes. <br /> INABA: And I, of course, we want to help our local families, and we don't want to put them in a <br /> harder place if they experience hard times. But again, where do we draw the line and what is fair <br /> for one is fair for all? So, it just calls into question our current practices that we have no idea, and <br /> even if we were to implement a reporting process that, on a quarterly basis for example, the <br /> Council receives a report from the Planning Department indicating who received the <br /> administrative extensions and for what, it's after the fact. There's no, it's a decision by the <br /> Planning Director at the Planning Director's discretion versus this whole process that we've all <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT G(DRAFT) <br />