COM 0898.012 2020-2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

always put in. So, we have, is it our job to have to try and take it out every single time and have a discussion on that or are we going to be clear? And another thing about administrative extension. So, Deputy Darrow said in some cases a one-year extension is given, maybe not the full additional five years,pending what happens in that first year. That's, that's all the applicants should be getting. Doesn't matter what happens after the first year, the ordinance only allows for one administrative extension. So, I don't know what has been going on, and that's the point here. If they gave one year, they cannot give another year or another four years after that. Doesn't matter what has been agreed upon as a result of that first-year administrative extension, the ordinance only allows for one administrative extension. VITOUSEK: If I might ask that our Commission make a motion so that we can discuss this without losing the fact-finding period, but we can actually discuss our thoughts and perspectives on this. I think I, you know, welcome Couneilmember Inaba to stay up in case there are further questions and information as needed, but if we could make a motion. And again,just to clarify, the motion that we are discussing,the agenda item that we are discussing is the language that was submitted to us and reviewed by the Planning Director that recommends that unless specifically authorized by the Council, extension of time to satisfy conditions may not be allowed by the Director. So that is the language that that we are reviewing today. Would anybody like to make a motion? PAISHON-DUARTE: So move. VITOUSEK: Okay, a motion to forward a favorable recommendation? PAISHON-DUARTE: Oh, I'm sorry, I thought we are having a discussion. VITOUSEK: Well, for us we have to make a motion on the item before we can have our open discussion. PAISHON-DUARTE: I'd like to make a motion to make a favorable um VITOUSEK: Recommendation? PAISHON-DUARTE: —recommendation. VITOUSEK: Mahalo. Is there a second? KANUHA: I'll second. VITOUSEK: Okay. Motion by Commissioner Paishon-Duarte, second by Commissioner Kanuha. We can open it up for discussion at this point. And my answer to Couneilmember Inaba's question of should it be the Council's job to review it every time, and I think it is. I think that every development, every permit, is unique, it's in a different area,they all have a unique set of environmental concerns, cultural concerns, community concerns, and I don't think there's one formula that we can apply to adequately take into account all of that. And so that's why there's so 14 EXHIBIT G(DRAFT)